Introduction:
The question of whether the verdict by the commission of enquiry was on the expected lines requires an examination of the factors surrounding the commission, its mandate, and the evidence presented during the investigation.

Understanding the commission of enquiry:
- A commission of enquiry is an independent body established to investigate a particular issue or event.
- It is tasked with gathering evidence, examining witnesses, and delivering a verdict based on the findings.

Factors influencing expectations:
Several factors can influence the expectations regarding the verdict of a commission of enquiry:
1. Mandate: The specific mandate given to the commission determines the scope of its investigation. If the mandate is narrow, the expectations may be limited. Conversely, a broad mandate may raise expectations for a comprehensive verdict.
2. Political climate: The prevailing political climate can impact expectations. If there is public pressure or strong political interests involved, expectations may be heightened.
3. Evidence: The nature and strength of the evidence presented during the investigation can shape expectations. If compelling evidence is available, expectations for a clear verdict may be higher.
4. Transparency: The transparency and fairness of the commission's proceedings can influence expectations. If the process is perceived as impartial and transparent, expectations for a fair verdict may increase.

Evaluation of the verdict:
To determine whether the verdict was on the expected lines, it is essential to assess the factors mentioned above and the outcome of the commission's investigation.
- If the commission's mandate was narrow, and it delivered a verdict within that scope, the verdict may be considered on the expected lines.
- If the political climate was highly charged, and the verdict aligned with the prevailing sentiments, it could be seen as expected.
- The strength and credibility of the evidence presented during the investigation are crucial. If the verdict aligns with the evidence, it would be considered on the expected lines.
- Transparency in the commission's proceedings is vital for maintaining public trust. If the process was fair and transparent, and the verdict reflects that, it would meet the expectations.

Conclusion:
The assessment of whether the verdict by the commission of enquiry was on the expected lines depends on several factors such as the mandate, political climate, evidence, and transparency. By evaluating these factors and comparing them to the outcome of the investigation, a determination can be made regarding the alignment of the verdict with expectations.