GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A study of children's television-watching...
Start Learning for Free
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.
Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?
- a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.
- b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.
- c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.
- d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal De...
(D) validates the representativeness of the sample directly. The author's conclusion is about all parents of children aged 7-10. A study that “gives appropriate weight” to kids with diverse backgrounds is therefore more representative. (D) is the correct answer. (A) is irrelevant because it deals with parents who prohibit their children from watching any television, rather than parents who hold their kids to a 25-hour-per-week limit. (B) is not relevant because it concerns physical fitness tests, not school performance. (C) does nothing to suggest that parents should limit their children's thing to 25 hours per week. It merely offers one reason that the shows kids watch are of little educational value. And (E) is irrelevant. The argument is not concerned with the habits of these children as they age; it deals only with the school performance of children from age 7 to 10. Choice (D) is correct.
Most Upvoted Answer
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal De...
Importance of Appropriate Weight to Children of Different Backgrounds
Children from different backgrounds may have varying levels of access to educational resources outside of school, such as tutoring or enrichment programs. Therefore, it is crucial for the Department of Education study to give appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide. This ensures that the findings are applicable and relevant to a diverse population of children, strengthening the argument for limiting television-watching habits.
Explanation of Answer Choice D
Option D directly addresses the importance of considering children from diverse backgrounds in the study conducted by the Department of Education. By giving appropriate weight to children of different backgrounds, the study can accurately reflect the impact of excessive television-watching on the academic performance of children aged 7-10. This strengthens the argument that parents should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week, as the study's findings are more likely to be valid across various demographics. Therefore, option D is the best choice to strengthen the argument presented in the passage.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal Department of Education found that children aged 7-10 who watched more than 25 hours of television per week performed worse in school than children of the same age who watched fewer than 25 hours of television per week. Therefore, parents of children aged 7-10 should prohibit their children from watching more than 25 hours of television per week.Which of the following, if true, would be best to strengthen the argument above?a)A separate study, by a renowned graduate school education, found that when parents prohibited their children from watching any television, the children's reading scores increase rapidly and significantly and stayed high indefinitely.b)Children who watched more than 25 hours of television per week also performed worse on measures of physical fitness than children who watched fewer than 25 hours per week.c)The television shows that children aged 7-10 are most likely to watch are saturated with advertisements for products, such as toys and candy, of little educational value.d)The Department of Education study gave appropriate weight to children of backgrounds representative of children nationwide.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup