GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > During the Second World War, about 375,000 ci...
Start Learning for Free
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.
Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?
Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?
- a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseas
- b)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deaths
- c)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuries
- d)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths
- e)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forces
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the Unite...
Concluding from the similar numbers of deaths in two groups that the relative danger of death was similar for both groups is absurd if, as here, one group was far smaller. D exposes this absurdity by pointing out the need to compare death rates of the two groups, which would reveal the higher death rate for the smaller group. Therefore, D is the best answer. Since the conclusion acknowledges the difference between the number of civilian and armed forces deaths, expressing this difference as a percentage, as suggested by B, is beside the point. A is inappropriate because it simply adds a third group to the two being compared. Because cause of death in not at issue, C and E are irrelevant.
Most Upvoted Answer
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the Unite...
Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group:
- By comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths, we can get a more accurate picture of the relative danger of being in the armed forces overseas versus staying at home as a civilian.
- This approach takes into account the size of each group, providing a more meaningful comparison.
- It allows us to see the risk of death in each group more clearly, as it standardizes the data based on the population size.
- This method would reveal that, despite the total number of deaths being similar, the death rate per thousand members of the armed forces overseas is likely much higher than that of civilians in the United States.
- Therefore, this comparison method exposes the flaw in the initial conclusion that being overseas in the armed forces during World War II was not much more dangerous than staying at home as a civilian.
- By comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths, we can get a more accurate picture of the relative danger of being in the armed forces overseas versus staying at home as a civilian.
- This approach takes into account the size of each group, providing a more meaningful comparison.
- It allows us to see the risk of death in each group more clearly, as it standardizes the data based on the population size.
- This method would reveal that, despite the total number of deaths being similar, the death rate per thousand members of the armed forces overseas is likely much higher than that of civilians in the United States.
- Therefore, this comparison method exposes the flaw in the initial conclusion that being overseas in the armed forces during World War II was not much more dangerous than staying at home as a civilian.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Question Description
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?a)Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasb)Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsc)Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesd)Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathse)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forcesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup