GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  During the past decade, the labor market in F... Start Learning for Free
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.
  • a)
    principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers
  • b)
    principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers
  • c)
    principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firing
  • d)
    principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stifled
  • e)
    principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operat...
The original sentence contains several errors. First, the pronoun "their" logically refers to alpacas; however, since the word alpacas' is in possessive form, it is an awkward antecedent for any pronoun (although it is technically legal to refer to a possessive noun with a possessive pronoun such as "their").
Second, the singular verb "fetches" is paired with the plural noun phrase "five pounds of fleece." Third, the use of the semicolon is improper. A semicolon can correctly be used to separate two independent clauses (subject + verb). Here, however, what follows the semicolon is not a clause since it can not stand alone as a sentence.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) This choice does not remedy the pronoun issue, merely replacing "their" with "its". The "its" now seems to refer to "fleece"; however, it is not the market value of the fleece to which the Alpacas' fleece is being compared. This choice also does not correct the subject-verb or semicolon problems.
(C) This choice does not remedy the pronoun issue, merely replacing "their" with "its". The "its" now seems to refer to "fleece"; however, it is not the market value of the fleece to which the Alpacas' fleece is being compared.
This choice does fix the semicolon issue. Nevertheless, the construction "while... even though..." is awkward, since it presents two successive contrasts. The subject-verb issue ("pounds fetch") has been corrected.
(D) CORRECT. The pronoun issue is solved by replacing the pronoun "the animal's." The semicolon correctly separates two independent clauses. The "while" correctly separates two contrasting ideas, and the verb "fetch" agrees with "pounds."
(E) The subject-verb disagreement remains ("pounds fetches)". Moreover, describing "worth" as "little" is awkward in this context; a better choice would be "low." Nonetheless, the pronoun issue is remedied by replacing "their" with "the animal's". The semicolon is used correctly here (two clauses).
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operat...
E) principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

Explanation:
- This option correctly conveys that the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles.
- It states that the functioning of the labor market has been stifled by various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers.
- The use of "instead" indicates a contrast between the expected free market principles and the actual functioning of the labor market.
- The use of "its" refers back to the labor market, providing clarity in the sentence.
- The use of "various government regulations" accurately describes the multiple regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers.
- The sentence is concise and clear, conveying the intended meaning effectively.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The author’s attitude regarding oil well drilling regulations can most accurately be described as

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The author uses the phrase “the hazards of insufficient knowledge” primarily in order to refer to the risks resulting from

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The passage states which one of the following about underground oil reservoirs?

Top Courses for GMAT

During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to freemarket principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workers.a)principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersb)principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of variousgovernment regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workersc)principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations thatvariously restrict worker hiring and firingd)principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various governmentregulations, its functioning being stiflede)principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulationsrestricting the hiring and firing of workersCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev