The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The leader of the physics seminar was prepare...

a)
for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable
b)
for everyone in attendance did not know
c)
with everyone in attendance not knowing
d)
with everyone attending not knowledgeable
e)
for not everyone attending knew

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions he...

This sentence is causative. ‘Because’ or ‘for’ the reason that everyone was not talkative, something happened. The word ‘with’ is clearly the wrong choice here. It does not imply instrumentation, not causation. Choice B changes the meaning. ‘Not everyone knew’ has a different meaning from ‘everyone did not know’. Last of all, choice A is incorrect because it is too wordy. Choice E is the correct answer.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions he...

Explanation:
The sentence given is: "The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussed involved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession."

The sentence is trying to convey that the leader of the seminar was prepared to start discussions because not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable about the new theories of quantum mechanics being discussed. Let's analyze each option to see which one conveys this meaning correctly.

a) for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable
This option is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "for not everyone" is not a correct construction in this context.

b) for everyone in attendance did not know
This option is also grammatically incorrect. The phrase "for everyone in attendance did not know" is not a correct construction in this context.

c) with everyone in attendance not knowing
This option is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "with everyone in attendance not knowing" is not a correct construction in this context.

d) with everyone attending not knowledgeable
This option is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "with everyone attending not knowledgeable" is not a correct construction in this context.

e) for not everyone attending knew
This option is the correct answer. It conveys the intended meaning of the sentence by stating that not everyone attending the seminar knew about the new theories of quantum mechanics being discussed. The phrase "for not everyone attending knew" is grammatically correct and effectively conveys the cause and effect relationship between the leader being prepared and the lack of knowledge among the attendees.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'E' - "for not everyone attending knew".

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q. The author says ‘there was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article’ to emphasize which of the following points?

View answer

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q.According to Simpson and Armstrong, virtual communities

View answer

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q. The primary purpose of the passage is to

View answer

On May 5th, 1997, the European edition of Business Tech Magazine led with Hoffman’s cover story "Internet Communities: How Theyre Shaping Electronic Commerce". This cover story highlights the extent to which the term virtual community has become almost synonymous with various forms of group-CMC (computer-mediated communication), including email-list forums, chat-systems such as IRC, web-based discussion areas and UseNet news-groups. There was no debate in the Business Tech Magazine article as to whether the group-CMC discussions are really communities, rather how the community, as opposed to content, can be used to encourage people to return to a particular part of cyberspace for commercial gain. In a similar vein, Simpson and Armstrong in "Internet Gain" argue that ignoring virtual communities would be a great loss of a marketing tool for businesses. They define virtual communities as computer-mediated space where there is an integration of content and communication with an emphasis on member-generated content. Not all virtual community commentators agree with the Spartan position taken by Hoffman. Rheingold, one of the prime popularizers of the term virtual community, provides us with a more emotive definition in his book The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. According to Rheingold, "virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace". Rheingolds definition is extremely popular and has been quoted in many discussions about virtual communities. As discussed below, for social scientists, particularly sociologists, Rheingolds definition raises many issues, especially concerning the notion of community. This is because Rheingold argues via a variety of analogies from the real world such as homesteading that virtual communities are indeed new forms of "community". In fact, Rheingold implies that virtual communities are actually "a kind of ultimate flowering of a community". Moreover, Rheingold maintains that whenever computer-mediated communications technology becomes available; people inevitably create communities with it. Rheingold can thus be labeled as a technological determinist as he holds that there is a predictable relationship between technology and peoples behavior. The debate over the validity of Rheingolds position has raised doubts about the existence of virtual communities and the appropriate use of the term. Weinreich claims that the idea of virtual communities must be wrong because the community is a collective of kinship networks that share a common geographic region, a common history, and a shared value system, usually rooted in a common religion. In other words, Weinreich rejects the existence of virtual communities because group-CMC discussions cannot possibly meet his definition. In Weinreichs view, anyone with even a basic knowledge of sociology understands that information exchange in no way constitutes a community.Q.Weinreich rejects Rheingold’s inclusion of virtual communities in the definition of communities for all of the following reasons EXCEPT

View answer

A minor league baseball franchise experienced a drop in attendance this week after they suffered three losses by margins of ten runs or more last week. Many spectators of those games wrote letters to the editors of the local sporting news, complaining of the poor play of the team in those three losses. Nevertheless, the front office of this baseball franchise maintains that the teams poor play in those three losses has nothing to do with this weeks decline in attendance.Q.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the position held by the front office of the baseball franchise?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The leader of the physics seminar was prepared to start discussions herself, fornot everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that the material being discussedinvolved new theories of quantum mechanics unknown to many in the profession.a)for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeableb)for everyone in attendance did not knowc)with everyone in attendance not knowingd)with everyone attending not knowledgeablee)for not everyone attending knewCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam