Commerce Exam  >  Commerce Questions  >  Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility ... Start Learning for Free
Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of:
a. Units
b. Level of satisfaction
c. Constants
d. None of these
is the answer is "a".?
Most Upvoted Answer
Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. ...
The correct answer is b. Level of satisfaction.

Explanation:

Ordinal concept of utility is an economic theory that measures utility in terms of the level of satisfaction derived from consuming goods or services. It suggests that individuals can rank their preferences for different goods and services based on the satisfaction they derive from them, but it does not assign any specific numerical values or units to utility.

Let's break down the answer into headings and HTML bullet points to provide a detailed explanation:

1. What is the ordinal concept of utility?
The ordinal concept of utility is a theory in economics that focuses on the ranking or ordering of preferences. It suggests that individuals can rank their preferences for different goods and services, indicating which ones they prefer more than others. However, it does not quantify the exact amount of utility or assign any specific units to it.

2. How does the ordinal concept of utility work?
According to this concept, individuals can compare and rank their preferences based on the level of satisfaction they derive from consuming goods or services. For example, if a person prefers consuming apples over oranges, it means that they derive more satisfaction or utility from eating apples. However, it does not specify how much more utility or satisfaction they derive.

3. Why is the answer b. Level of satisfaction?
The answer is b. Level of satisfaction because the ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of the satisfaction or preference ranking individuals assign to different goods or services. It does not involve quantifying utility using units or assigning numerical values. Instead, it focuses on understanding the relative preferences of individuals and their perception of satisfaction.

4. Comparison with other options:
- Option a. Units: Utility is not expressed in terms of units because the ordinal concept does not assign specific numerical values to utility.
- Option c. Constants: Constants are not relevant to the ordinal concept of utility as it focuses on the ranking of preferences rather than specific numerical values.
- Option d. None of these: This option is incorrect as the ordinal concept of utility does express utility in terms of the level of satisfaction or preference ranking.

In conclusion, the ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of the level of satisfaction or preference ranking individuals assign to different goods or services. It does not involve assigning units or specific numerical values to utility.
Community Answer
Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. ...
B
Explore Courses for Commerce exam

Similar Commerce Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations” (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principlesof individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.Q. ______ is a curve showing a different combination of two goods, each combination offering the same level of satisfaction to the consumer.

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations' ' (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principlesof individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.Q. How is utility measured in Ordinal utility theory?

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations' ' (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principlesof individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.Q. Under Cardinal Utility approach, utility is measured in utils.

Top Courses for Commerce

Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".?
Question Description
Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? for Commerce 2025 is part of Commerce preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Commerce exam syllabus. Information about Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? covers all topics & solutions for Commerce 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".?.
Solutions for Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Commerce. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Commerce Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".?, a detailed solution for Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? has been provided alongside types of Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Ordinal concept of utility expresses utility in terms of: a. Units b. Level of satisfaction c. Constants d. None of theseis the answer is "a".? tests, examples and also practice Commerce tests.
Explore Courses for Commerce exam

Top Courses for Commerce

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev