Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Since the quality of a product is defined by ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?

a)
The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.
b)
A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.
c)
Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors, and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.
d)
Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.
e)
The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Critical Reasoning- 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the life...

Pre-Thinking

Conclusion Clarification

The author concludes that JFP are not, on an average, of a superior quality to CFP. The conclusion is based on the fact that the quality of a product is defined by its features and lifetime and that the JFP offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and have the same average life-time as the CFP.

Pre-Thinking Approach

We are required to support the assertion that JFP may be of a superior quality to the CFP. Note that this assertion is against the conclusion of the argument. Thus, we are required to weaken the argument. Let’s see how we can make the conclusion less believable. To do so, we will look at the logical structure, focusing on linkage 1 and the conclusion. Thus the way to falsify the conclusion will be to break this linkage.

Linkage#1 – (ref. logical structure)

Weakener –A new piece of information that suggests that the JFP could be of superior quality to the CFP.

- Instance 1: Studies have shown that even though both JFP and CFP have a lifetime of approximately 3 years, most of the features offered by CFP stop functioning after the first year of use itself.

With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.

Answer Choices

The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.

Incorrect - Opposite

This option says that CFP are relatively easier to use. This argues in favor of CFP, thus this piece of information is opposite to what we are looking for in the correct answer.

A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

The only two features that the argument takes into account while gauging the quality of a product are its features and life-time.

Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors, and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.

Correct

This option is written along the lines of our pre-thinking linkage weakener. It highlights a difference between JFP and CFP. As the functioning of the original features of a product is linked with the malfunction rate, a lower malfunction rate can make JFP relatively superior in quality.

Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.

Incorrect - Opposite

If anything, this option supports the argument by highlighting a similarity between the food processors. Same shortcomings don’t show the superiority of Japanese food processors over Chinese ones.

The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

The argument compares the features of processors that are in comparative price ranges.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later. Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

View answer

MixIt, a company that manufactures smoothie-makers, has been manufacturing smoothie-makers as well as spare parts for its products. Since old smoothie-makers develop faults and spare parts are required to fix them, MixIt should continue manufacturing spare parts for its older models in the future.Which of the following, if true, would best support the recommendation that the company should no longer manufacture spare parts for its models?

View answer

Until recently, most automobile manufacturers minimized the weight of their cars to maximize mileage. The safest chassis were heavy, so few manufacturers equipped their cars with the safest chassis. This year the chassis metal that has sold best to automobile manufacturers has been the safest one-a clear indication that manufacturers are assigning a higher priority to safety than to mileage.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

View answer

An airplane engine manufacturer developed a new engine model with safety features lacking in the earlier model, which was still being manufactured. During the first year that both were sold, the earlier model far outsold the new model; the manufacturer thus concluded that safety was not the customers’ primary consideration.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the manufacturer’s conclusion?

View answer

Kazuko Nakane’s history of the early Japanese immigrants to central California’s Pajaro Valley focuses on the development of farming communities there from 1890 to 1940. The Issei (first-generation immigrants) were brought into the Pajaro Valley to raise sugar beets. Like Issei laborers in American cities, Japanese men in rural areas sought employment via the “boss” system. The system comprised three elements: immigrant wage laborers; Issei boardinghouses where laborers stayed; and labor contractors, who gathered workers for a particular job and then negotiated a contract between workers and employer. This same system was originally utilized by the Chinese laborers who had preceded the Japanese. A related institution was the “labor club,” which provided job information and negotiated employment contracts and other legal matters, such as the rental of land, for Issei who chose to belong and paid an annual fee to the cooperative for membership.When the local sugar beet industry collapsed in 1902, the Issei began to lease land from the valley’s strawberry farmers. The Japanese provided the labor and the crop was divided between laborers and landowners. The Issei thus moved quickly from wage-labor employment to sharecropping agreements. A limited amount of economic progress was made as some Issei were able to rent or buy farmland directly, while others joined together to form farming corporations. As the Issei began to operate farms, they began to marry and start families, forming an established Japanese American community. Unfortunately, the Issei’s efforts to attain agricultural independence were hampered by government restrictions, such as the Alien Land Law of 1913. But immigrants could circumvent such exclusionary laws by leasing or purchasing land in their American-born children’s names.Nakane’s case study of one rural Japanese American community provides valuable information about the lives and experiences of the Issei. It is, however, too particularistic. This limitation derives from Nakane’s methodology—that of oral history—which cannot substitute for a broader theoretical or comparative perspective. Future research might well consider two issues raised by her study: were the Issei of the Pajaro Valley similar to or different from Issei in urban settings, and what variations existed between rural Japanese American communities?Which of the following best describes a “labor club,” as defined in the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Since the quality of a product is defined by the features and the lifetime it has, food processors produced by Japanese manufacturers are not, on an average, of a superior quality to those produced by Chinese manufacturers. The Japanese food processors offer similar features in comparative price ranges, and they have the same average life-time as the Chinese ones.Which of the following, if true, most supports the assertion that Japanese food processors may be of a superior quality to the Chinese ones?a)The Chinese food processors are comparatively easier to use than the Japanese ones.b)A survey conducted by the independent trade magazine Business Now showed that on average Japanese manufacturers have more service-centers for their products than their Chinese counterparts.c)Chinese food processors have a comparatively higher malfunction rate than that of Japanese food processors,and studies have proven that a lower malfunction rate is correlated with efficient functioning of the original features offered.d)Both the Japanese and the Chinese food processors use the FP-1000 technology, which is known to require constant servicing.e)The features of Japanese food processors that are in a higher price range than most Chinese food processors are far more advanced than those of Chinese food processors.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam