A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is i...

A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?

a)
11236
b)
11025
c)
14400
d)
12696
e)
Cannot be determined

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. ...

The shape of the area used for growing cabbages has remained a square in both the years.
Let the side of the square area used for growing cabbages this year be X ft.
Therefore, the area of the ground used for cultivation this year = X² sq.ft.

Let the side of the square area used for growing cabbages last year be Y ft.
Therefore, the area of the ground used for cultivation last year = Y² sq.ft.

As the number of cabbages grown has increased by 211, the area would have increased by 211 sq ft because each cabbage takes 1 sq ft space.

Hence, X² - Y² = 211
(X + Y)(X - Y) = 211.
211 is a prime number and hence it will have only two factors. i.e., 211 and 1.
Therefore, 211 can be expressed as product of 2 numbers in only way = 211 * 1
i.e., (X + Y)(X - Y) = 211 * 1
So, (X + Y) should be 211 and (X - Y) should be 1.
Solving the two equations we get X = 106 and Y = 105.

Therefore, number of cabbages produced this year = X² = 106² = 11236.
The area in both the years are squares of two numbers.
That rules out choice D. 12696 is not the square of any number.
Check Choice A: If this year's produce is 11236, last year's produce would have been 11236 - 211 = 11025
11025 is the square of 105.
So, 11236 is the answer.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. ...

Problem:

A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?

Solution:

Given:
- Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in the garden.
- The garden is in the shape of a square.
- The number of cabbages grown this year is 211 more than last year.

Let's assume that the lady grew x cabbages last year. Therefore, the area of the garden would be x square feet.

Since the garden is in the shape of a square, the length and width of the garden would be equal. Let's assume that the length and width of the garden are y feet.

Therefore, we can write:

- Area of the garden last year = x = y^2 (since the garden is a square)
- Number of cabbages grown last year = x (since each cabbage takes 1 square foot)

This year, the lady grew 211 more cabbages than last year. Therefore, the total number of cabbages grown this year would be:

- Number of cabbages grown this year = x + 211

Since the garden is still in the shape of a square, the area of the garden would also be y^2 square feet. We know that each cabbage takes 1 square foot of area. Therefore, the total number of cabbages that can be grown in the garden this year would be:

- Total number of cabbages that can be grown = y^2

Equating the above two equations, we get:

- y^2 = x + 211

Substituting the value of x from the first equation, we get:

- y^2 = y^2 + 211
- 211 = 0

This is not possible. Therefore, the answer cannot be determined.

However, if we assume that the area of the garden has increased by a certain amount, then we can find the answer. Let's assume that the area of the garden has increased by k square feet. Therefore, the new area of the garden would be y^2 + k square feet.

We know that each cabbage takes 1 square foot of area. Therefore, the total number of cabbages that can be grown in the garden this year would be:

- Total number of cabbages that can be grown = y^2 + k

Equating the above two equations, we get:

- y^2 + k = x + 211

Substituting the value of x from the first equation, we get:

- y^2 + k = y^2 + 211
- k = 211

Therefore, the lady produced 211 more cabbages this year than last year, and the total number of cabbages produced this year is:

- Total number of cabbages produced this year = x + 211 = y^2 + 211 = (y^2 + k) = (y^2 + 211) = (y + 14)^2
- Since the area of the garden has increased by 14 feet (k = 14^2),

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A lady grows cabbage in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square foot of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages when compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbage has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?

View answer

Experts anticipate that global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) will have doubled by the end of the twenty-first century. It is known that CO2 can contribute to global warming by (5) trapping solar energy that is being reradiated as heat from the Earth’s surface. However, some research has suggested that elevated CO2 levels could enhance the photosynthetic rates of plants, resulting in a lush world of agricultural abundance, and that this CO2 (10) fertilization effect might eventually decrease the rate of global warming. The increased vegetation in such an environment could be counted on to draw more CO2 from the atmosphere. The level of CO2 would thus increase at a lower rate than many experts have (15) predicted.However, while a number of recent studies confirm that plant growth would be generally enhanced in an atmosphere rich in CO2, they also suggest that increased CO2 would differentially increase the growth (20) rate of different species of plants, which could eventually result in decreased agricultural yields. Certain important crops such as corn and sugarcane that currently have higher photosynthetic efficiencies than other plants may lose that edge in an atmosphere (25) rich in CO2. Patterson and Flint have shown that these important crops may experience yield reductions because of the increased performance of certain weeds. Such differences in growth rates between plant species could also alter ecosystem stability. Studies have (30) shown that within rangeland regions, for example, a weedy grass grows much better with plentiful CO2 than do three other grasses. Because this weedy grass predisposes land to burning, its potential increase may lead to greater numbers of and more severe wildfires in (35) future rangeland communities.It is clear that the CO2 fertilization effect does not guarantee the lush world of agricultural abundance that once seemed likely, but what about the potential for the increased uptake of CO2 to decrease the rate of global (40) warming? Some studies suggest that the changes accompanying global warming will not improve the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to absorb CO2. Billings’ simulation of global warming conditions in wet tundra grasslands showed that the level of CO2 (45) actually increased. Plant growth did increase under these conditions because of warmer temperatures and increased CO2 levels. But as the permafrost melted, more peat (accumulated dead plant material) began to decompose. This process in turn liberated more CO2 to (50) the atmosphere. Billings estimated that if summer temperatures rose four degrees Celsius, the tundra would liberate 50 percent more CO2 than it does currently. In a warmer world, increased plant growth, which could absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, would (55) not compensate for this rapid increase in decomposition rates. This observation is particularly important because high-latitude habitats such as the tundra are expected to experience the greatest temperature increase.The passage suggests that the hypothesis mentioned in the first paragraph is not entirely accurate because it fails to take into account which one of the following in predicting the effects of increased vegetation on the rate of global warming?

View answer

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?

View answer

Over the past twenty years in the U.S., the average number of hours per week that people spend at work has increased from approximately 41 hours to nearly 52 hours. It is thought that this change has played an important role in the corresponding increase in average body mass index for working Americans over the same period. The increased time at work does not allow people as much time to exercise and engage in healthy activities that help reduce weight.Which of the following questions would be most useful to answer in determining whether the increased workweek is an important cause of the increase in average body mass index over the past twenty years?

View answer

Climatic conditions are delicately adjusted to the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere. If there were a change in the atmosphere—for example, in the relative proportions of atmospheric gases—the climate would probably change also. A slight increase in water vapor, for instance, would increase the heat-retaining capacity of the atmosphere and would lead to a rise in global temperatures. In contrast, a large increase in water vapor would increase the thickness and extent of the cloud layer, reducing the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth’s surface.The level of carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere has an important effect on climatic change. Most of the Earth’s incoming energy is short-wavelength radiation, which tends to pass through atmospheric CO2 easily. The Earth, however, reradiates much of the received energy as long-wavelength radiation, which CO2 absorbs and then remits toward the Earth. This phenomenon, known as the greenhouse effect, can result in an increase in the surface temperature of a planet. An extreme example of the effect is shown by Venus, a planet covered by heavy clouds composed mostly of CO2, whose surface temperatures have been measured at 430. If the CO2 content of the atmosphere is reduced, the temperature falls. According to one respectable theory, if the atmospheric CO2 concentration were halved, the Earth would become completely covered with ice. Another equally respectable theory, however, states that a halving of the CO2 concentration would lead only to a reduction in global temperatures of 3.If, because of an increase in forest fires or volcanic activity, the CO2 content of the atmosphere increased, a warmer climate would be produced. Plant growth, which relies on both the warmth and the availability of CO2 would probably increase. As a consequence, plants would use more and more CO2. Eventually CO2 levels would diminish and the climate, in turn, would become cooler. With reduced temperatures many plants would die; CO2 would thereby be returned to the atmosphere and gradually the temperature would rise again. Thus, if this process occurred, there might be a long-term oscillation in the amount of CO2 present in the atmosphere, with regular temperature increases and decreases of a set magnitude.Some climatologists argue that the burning of fossil fuels has raised the level of CO2 in the atmosphere and has caused a global temperature increase of at least 1. But a supposed global temperature rise of 1 may in reality be only several regional temperature increases, restricted to areas where there are many meteorological stations and caused simply by shifts in the pattern of atmospheric circulation. Other areas, for example the Southern Hemisphere oceanic zone, may be experiencing an equivalent temperature decrease that is unrecognized because of the shortage of meteorological recording stations.The passage supplies information for answering which of the following questions?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A lady grows cabbages in her garden that is in the shape of a square. Each cabbage takes 1 square feet of area in her garden. This year, she has increased her output by 211 cabbages as compared to last year. The shape of the area used for growing the cabbages has remained a square in both these years. How many cabbages did she produce this year?a)11236b)11025c)14400d)12696e)Cannot be determinedCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam