All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The population of city X increased by 10% in ... Start Learning for Free
The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at the
end of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?
  • a)
    23000
  • b)
    25000
  • c)
    25500
  • d)
    26000
  • e)
    26500
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year...
Given:
  • Population of city X at starting of the year 2013 (Ps2013 ) = 21,000
  • Percentage increment in population of city X in year 2013(P.I2013 )= 10%
  • Percentage increment in population of city X in year 2014(P.I2014 ) = 15%
To Find :
  • Population of the city at end of year 2014 (Pe2014 )
Approach:
  • In order to find the Population of the city at end of the year 2014 (Pe2014 ), we need to first work out the population at the start of the year 2014 (Ps2014).
For calculating the population at start of year 2014, we will find the population of the city at end of year 2013 (Pe2013 ), which is equal to the population at the start of the year 2014.
  • We know that → (Ps2013 ) = 21,000 & (P.I. 2013)=10%
  • So we can find the population of the city at end of year 2013 (Pe2013 ) or at the starting of the year 2014 (Ps2014 ) by → (Ps2014 )= Ps2013 + (P.I.2013 )* (Ps2013 )
  • Having calculated the population of the city X at the start of year 2014 and using the percentage increment of the year 2014, we will be able to calculate the population at end of year 2014 by → (Pe2014)= Ps2014 +(P.I.2014 )* (Ps2014 )
Working out:
Answer:
So population at end of year 2014 will be 26565, which is approximately equal to 26500.
Hence answer option E is correct
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Experts anticipate that global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) will have doubled by the end of the twenty-first century. It is known that CO2 can contribute to global warming by (5) trapping solar energy that is being reradiated as heat from the Earth’s surface. However, some research has suggested that elevated CO2 levels could enhance the photosynthetic rates of plants, resulting in a lush world of agricultural abundance, and that this CO2 (10) fertilization effect might eventually decrease the rate of global warming. The increased vegetation in such an environment could be counted on to draw more CO2 from the atmosphere. The level of CO2 would thus increase at a lower rate than many experts have (15) predicted.However, while a number of recent studies confirm that plant growth would be generally enhanced in an atmosphere rich in CO2, they also suggest that increased CO2 would differentially increase the growth (20) rate of different species of plants, which could eventually result in decreased agricultural yields. Certain important crops such as corn and sugarcane that currently have higher photosynthetic efficiencies than other plants may lose that edge in an atmosphere (25) rich in CO2. Patterson and Flint have shown that these important crops may experience yield reductions because of the increased performance of certain weeds. Such differences in growth rates between plant species could also alter ecosystem stability. Studies have (30) shown that within rangeland regions, for example, a weedy grass grows much better with plentiful CO2 than do three other grasses. Because this weedy grass predisposes land to burning, its potential increase may lead to greater numbers of and more severe wildfires in (35) future rangeland communities.It is clear that the CO2 fertilization effect does not guarantee the lush world of agricultural abundance that once seemed likely, but what about the potential for the increased uptake of CO2 to decrease the rate of global (40) warming? Some studies suggest that the changes accompanying global warming will not improve the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to absorb CO2. Billings’ simulation of global warming conditions in wet tundra grasslands showed that the level of CO2 (45) actually increased. Plant growth did increase under these conditions because of warmer temperatures and increased CO2 levels. But as the permafrost melted, more peat (accumulated dead plant material) began to decompose. This process in turn liberated more CO2 to (50) the atmosphere. Billings estimated that if summer temperatures rose four degrees Celsius, the tundra would liberate 50 percent more CO2 than it does currently. In a warmer world, increased plant growth, which could absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, would (55) not compensate for this rapid increase in decomposition rates. This observation is particularly important because high-latitude habitats such as the tundra are expected to experience the greatest temperature increase.The passage suggests that the hypothesis mentioned in the first paragraph is not entirely accurate because it fails to take into account which one of the following in predicting the effects of increased vegetation on the rate of global warming?

Experts anticipate that global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) will have doubled by the end of the twenty-first century. It is known that CO2 can contribute to global warming by (5) trapping solar energy that is being reradiated as heat from the Earth’s surface. However, some research has suggested that elevated CO2 levels could enhance the photosynthetic rates of plants, resulting in a lush world of agricultural abundance, and that this CO2 (10) fertilization effect might eventually decrease the rate of global warming. The increased vegetation in such an environment could be counted on to draw more CO2 from the atmosphere. The level of CO2 would thus increase at a lower rate than many experts have (15) predicted.However, while a number of recent studies confirm that plant growth would be generally enhanced in an atmosphere rich in CO2, they also suggest that increased CO2 would differentially increase the growth (20) rate of different species of plants, which could eventually result in decreased agricultural yields. Certain important crops such as corn and sugarcane that currently have higher photosynthetic efficiencies than other plants may lose that edge in an atmosphere (25) rich in CO2. Patterson and Flint have shown that these important crops may experience yield reductions because of the increased performance of certain weeds. Such differences in growth rates between plant species could also alter ecosystem stability. Studies have (30) shown that within rangeland regions, for example, a weedy grass grows much better with plentiful CO2 than do three other grasses. Because this weedy grass predisposes land to burning, its potential increase may lead to greater numbers of and more severe wildfires in (35) future rangeland communities.It is clear that the CO2 fertilization effect does not guarantee the lush world of agricultural abundance that once seemed likely, but what about the potential for the increased uptake of CO2 to decrease the rate of global (40) warming? Some studies suggest that the changes accompanying global warming will not improve the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to absorb CO2. Billings’ simulation of global warming conditions in wet tundra grasslands showed that the level of CO2 (45) actually increased. Plant growth did increase under these conditions because of warmer temperatures and increased CO2 levels. But as the permafrost melted, more peat (accumulated dead plant material) began to decompose. This process in turn liberated more CO2 to (50) the atmosphere. Billings estimated that if summer temperatures rose four degrees Celsius, the tundra would liberate 50 percent more CO2 than it does currently. In a warmer world, increased plant growth, which could absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, would (55) not compensate for this rapid increase in decomposition rates. This observation is particularly important because high-latitude habitats such as the tundra are expected to experience the greatest temperature increase.Which one of the following best states the main point of the passage?

Experts anticipate that global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) will have doubled by the end of the twenty-first century. It is known that CO2 can contribute to global warming by (5) trapping solar energy that is being reradiated as heat from the Earth’s surface. However, some research has suggested that elevated CO2 levels could enhance the photosynthetic rates of plants, resulting in a lush world of agricultural abundance, and that this CO2 (10) fertilization effect might eventually decrease the rate of global warming. The increased vegetation in such an environment could be counted on to draw more CO2 from the atmosphere. The level of CO2 would thus increase at a lower rate than many experts have (15) predicted.However, while a number of recent studies confirm that plant growth would be generally enhanced in an atmosphere rich in CO2, they also suggest that increased CO2 would differentially increase the growth (20) rate of different species of plants, which could eventually result in decreased agricultural yields. Certain important crops such as corn and sugarcane that currently have higher photosynthetic efficiencies than other plants may lose that edge in an atmosphere (25) rich in CO2. Patterson and Flint have shown that these important crops may experience yield reductions because of the increased performance of certain weeds. Such differences in growth rates between plant species could also alter ecosystem stability. Studies have (30) shown that within rangeland regions, for example, a weedy grass grows much better with plentiful CO2 than do three other grasses. Because this weedy grass predisposes land to burning, its potential increase may lead to greater numbers of and more severe wildfires in (35) future rangeland communities.It is clear that the CO2 fertilization effect does not guarantee the lush world of agricultural abundance that once seemed likely, but what about the potential for the increased uptake of CO2 to decrease the rate of global (40) warming? Some studies suggest that the changes accompanying global warming will not improve the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to absorb CO2. Billings’ simulation of global warming conditions in wet tundra grasslands showed that the level of CO2 (45) actually increased. Plant growth did increase under these conditions because of warmer temperatures and increased CO2 levels. But as the permafrost melted, more peat (accumulated dead plant material) began to decompose. This process in turn liberated more CO2 to (50) the atmosphere. Billings estimated that if summer temperatures rose four degrees Celsius, the tundra would liberate 50 percent more CO2 than it does currently. In a warmer world, increased plant growth, which could absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, would (55) not compensate for this rapid increase in decomposition rates. This observation is particularly important because high-latitude habitats such as the tundra are expected to experience the greatest temperature increase.The passage suggests that Patterson and Flint would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements about increased levels of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The population of city X increased by 10% in year 2013 and 15% in year 2014. What is the approximate population of the city at theend of year 2014, if population of the city at the starting of year 2013 was 21,000?a)23000b)25000c)25500d)26000e)26500Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup