Directions to SolveBelow in each of the questions are given two statem...
Both the statements I and II are the effects of independent causes.
View all questions of this test
Directions to SolveBelow in each of the questions are given two statem...
Analysis of Statements
The two statements presented involve a police action and a civic administration decision regarding property tax. Let's analyze the context of each statement.
Statement I: Police Action
- The police employed a lathi-charge to manage an unruly mob.
- This indicates a response to a disturbance, possibly due to public dissent or unrest.
Statement II: Tax Increase
- The civic administration hiked property tax by 30%.
- This decision could lead to dissatisfaction among residents, potentially causing unrest.
Relationship Between Statements
- Independent Causes:
- Statement I (police action) and Statement II (tax hike) may have arisen from different circumstances. The tax hike alone could cause unrest, while the police action does not necessarily result from the tax hike.
- Lack of Direct Causation:
- There’s no clear cause-effect relationship where one statement directly results from the other. The police action does not directly stem from the tax increase but could be a reaction to broader discontent in the community.
Conclusion
Given the analysis, both statements can be classified as effects resulting from independent causes. The unrest caused by the tax hike may lead to police action, but they are not directly linked as cause and effect. Thus, the correct answer is option 'D': Both the statements I and II are effects of independent causes.