GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced... Start Learning for Free
While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.
Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?
  • a)
    The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.
  • b)
    The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.
  • c)
    Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.
  • d)
    Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.
  • e)
    Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural...
Pre-Thinking
Conclusion Clarification
The argument presents the conclusion of some experts. They recommend that fossils located in submarine regions no longer be accessed. The question requires us to support the conclusion that submarine fossils should continue to be mined. As this recommendation is against the conclusion drawn by some experts, the question requires us to weaken this conclusion.
Pre-Thinking Approach
Let’s see how we can make the conclusion less believable.  To do so, we will look at the logical structure, focusing on linkage 1 and the conclusion.  Thus, the way to weaken the conclusion will be to break this linkage i.e. find a new piece of information that  suggests that the recommendation made in the conclusion should not be followed i.e. submarine fossils should continue to be mined.
Linkage#1Submarine regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.
  • Weakener – What if despite the higher cost, mining submarine fossils is extremely advantageous? In such a case, the conclusion drawn by some experts won’t hold.
    • Instance 1: For example, what if the fossils found undersea are of significantly higher quality than the SM fossil in terms of the output of fuel they generate?
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
 
Answer Choices
A
The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.
Incorrect - Opposite
This option favors the recommendation by some experts by highlighting a negative aspect associated with submarine fossils. 
B
The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.
Incorrect - Opposite
This option too highlights a negative aspect associated with some submarine fossils. This information supports the conclusion drawn by some experts.
C
Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
This choice presents a superfluous comparison between SM fossils and perishable resources located above ground. The argument is about SM and UM fossils.
D
Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.
Correct
This option is written along the lines of our pre-thinking linkage. The higher energy generated can compensate for the higher cost.
E
Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
First of all, insurance against injuries isn’t linked to the argument in anyway, Second of all, this choice doesn’t specify which operations these companies are involved in – UM or SM.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural...
Explanation:

D. Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.
- This option provides a strong reason to support the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined.
- If each unit of energy generated from submarine fossils is at least twice as much as the energy generated from subterranean fossils, it indicates that accessing submarine fossils, despite the higher costs and difficulties involved, is more beneficial in terms of energy output.
- This increased energy generation efficiency from submarine fossils can justify the additional expenses and challenges associated with undersea mining operations.
- Therefore, this information strengthens the argument for continuing to mine submarine fossils for energy generation purposes.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Question Description
While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice While fossil fuels are rapidly being replaced by inexhaustible natural resources in order to conserve perishable resources, fossil fuels are still required to a certain extent to run power plants that generate alternative forms of energy. Some experts are of the opinion that fossils located in submarine regions should no longer be accessed, since such regions are difficult to reach, and undersea mining operations cost at least twice as much as subterranean mining does.Which of the following, if true, mostly strongly supports the recommendation that submarine fossils should continue to be mined?a)The amount of time taken to access submarine fossils is at least twice the amount required to access subterranean fossils.b)The usability of fossils for the purpose of fuel generation is dependent on the chemical composition of the fossil, and some submarine fossils do not meet the stipulated requirements.c)Some perishable resources are located above the surface level of the ground in areas such as caves and river banks and can be accessed far more easily than subterranean fossils can.d)Each unit of energy generated for each submarine fossil is at least twice as much as the energy generated for each unit of subterranean fossil.e)Most companies in the mining industry are insured against injuries caused to their employees while mining for fossils in areas where accidents are frequent.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev