GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  While surgical tools are constantly being upg... Start Learning for Free
While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.
Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?
  • a)
    Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorization
  • b)
    Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniques
  • c)
     Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.
  • d)
    Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.
  • e)
    Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC. 
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective ...
Pre-Thinking
Conclusion Clarification
Despite the fact that in one out of every 300 surgeries performed using the power MOR has resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body, CDC plans to continue to allow the use of MORs in cancer related treatments as long as a condition is fulfilled. The condition is that physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.
Pre-Thinking Approach
In order to evaluate the plan by CDC, we’ll evaluate the condition on which it is based.  Let’s look at the conditions under which the conclusion doesn’t hold.  The assumption then will be that these conditions don’t exist. 
Falsification Condition:  What if it’s not possible for the physicians to determine the effect of the treatment using MOR on a patient beforehand? In such a case, physicians will not be able to stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered. Thus, the CDC’s plan will not be based on a sound condition. Accordingly, the CDC assumes that:
Assumption: It’s possible to determine the result of a medical treatment on a patient beforehand.
With this pre-thinking in mind, let’s evaluate the answer choices.
Answer Choices
A
Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorization
Incorrect – Irrelevant
The process of banning the use of surgical tool is not relevant to assessing the CDC's plan, which is based on a very specific condition.
B
Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniques
Incorrect – Irrelevant
Patients' awareness of risk has no bearing on the evaluation of the plan, a plan that is based on the physician's calculation of the risk to the patient.
C
 Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.
Incorrect – Irrelevant
Benefit to some patients doesn't help us assess the plan that is based on assessing the impact on each, individual patient.
D
Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.
Correct
This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking. If effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed, the conclusion is strengthened. Otherwise, it is weakened.
E
Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC. 
Incorrect – Irrelevant
The side effects caused by other surgical tools are not relevant in accessing the CDC's plan to continue to allow the use of MORs.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective ...
Assessing the CDC's Plan

Effects of Surgical Procedure
- One of the most useful factors to consider in assessing the CDC's plan is whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before it is performed. This is crucial in the case of power morcellators, as the risk of spreading cancer cells can have serious consequences for the patient.
- Knowing whether there are reliable methods to predict the outcomes of surgeries using morcellators can help determine the feasibility and safety of continuing their use in oncological treatment.
By evaluating the ability to assess the effects of surgical procedures beforehand, the CDC can make informed decisions about the use of power morcellators in cancer treatment.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Antibiotics are chemical substances that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. The success of antibiotics against disease-causing bacteria is one of modern medicine’s great achievements. However, many bacteria harmful to humans have developed ways to circumvent the effects of antibiotics, and many infectious diseases are now much more difficult to treat than they were just a few decades ago. Antibiotic resistance is an especially difficult problem for hospitals with critically ill patients who are less able to fight off infections without the help of antibiotics.Bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance because they have the ability to adapt quickly to new environmental conditions. Most commonly, bacteria share with each other genetic material called resistance plasmids; these shared plasmids, which contain the genetic code enabling antibiotic resistance, can spread throughout a bacterial population to create a strain of resistant bacteria. Less commonly, a natural mutation that enables antibiotic resistance takes place within the chromosome of the bacteria, and the resulting strain of bacteria can reproduce and become dominant via natural selection. In the absence of human involvement, however, bacteria in the wild rarely develop resistance to antibiotics.In the United States, animals raised on industrial-scale factory farms are routinely administered low levels of antibiotics in their feed not as a cure for ongoing maladies, but primarily as a growth-enhancing agent to produce more meat and also as a prophylactic measure to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.Currently, several antibiotics that are used in human medical treatment are administered non-therapeutically to healthy livestock and poultry. Examples include tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin. This long-term non-therapeutic feeding of antibiotics to animals creates the ideal conditions for the development of antibioticresistant bacteria, as it kills the susceptible bacteria while leaving the resistant strains to reproduce and flourish.Europe is far ahead of the United States in the responsible use of antibiotics: On January 1, 2006, the European Union banned the feeding of all antibiotics to livestock for nontherapeutic purposes. This sweeping policy follows a 1998 ban on the non-therapeutic use of four medically-important antibiotics on animals. The time has come for the United States to follow Europe’s lead.Q.Based on the information in the passage, to which of the following practices would the author most likely be opposed?

Antibiotics are chemical substances that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. The success of antibiotics against disease-causing bacteria is one of modern medicine’s great achievements. However, many bacteria harmful to humans have developed ways to circumvent the effects of antibiotics, and many infectious diseases are now much more difficult to treat than they were just a few decades ago. Antibiotic resistance is an especially difficult problem for hospitals with critically ill patients who are less able to fight off infections without the help of antibiotics.Bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance because they have the ability to adapt quickly to new environmental conditions. Most commonly, bacteria share with each other genetic material called resistance plasmids; these shared plasmids, which contain the genetic code enabling antibiotic resistance, can spread throughout a bacterial population to create a strain of resistant bacteria. Less commonly, a natural mutation that enables antibiotic resistance takes place within the chromosome of the bacteria, and the resulting strain of bacteria can reproduce and become dominant via natural selection. In the absence of human involvement, however, bacteria in the wild rarely develop resistance to antibiotics.In the United States, animals raised on industrial-scale factory farms are routinely administered low levels of antibiotics in their feed not as a cure for ongoing maladies, but primarily as a growth-enhancing agent to produce more meat and also as a prophylactic measure to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.Currently, several antibiotics that are used in human medical treatment are administered non-therapeutically to healthy livestock and poultry. Examples include tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin. This long-term non-therapeutic feeding of antibiotics to animals creates the ideal conditions for the development of antibioticresistant bacteria, as it kills the susceptible bacteria while leaving the resistant strains to reproduce and flourish.Europe is far ahead of the United States in the responsible use of antibiotics: On January 1, 2006, the European Union banned the feeding of all antibiotics to livestock for nontherapeutic purposes. This sweeping policy follows a 1998 ban on the non-therapeutic use of four medically-important antibiotics on animals. The time has come for the United States to follow Europe’s lead.Q.Based on the information in the passage, which of the following statements can be inferred?

Antibiotics are chemical substances that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. The success of antibiotics against disease-causing bacteria is one of modern medicine’s great achievements. However, many bacteria harmful to humans have developed ways to circumvent the effects of antibiotics, and many infectious diseases are now much more difficult to treat than they were just a few decades ago. Antibiotic resistance is an especially difficult problem for hospitals with critically ill patients who are less able to fight off infections without the help of antibiotics.Bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance because they have the ability to adapt quickly to new environmental conditions. Most commonly, bacteria share with each other genetic material called resistance plasmids; these shared plasmids, which contain the genetic code enabling antibiotic resistance, can spread throughout a bacterial population to create a strain of resistant bacteria. Less commonly, a natural mutation that enables antibiotic resistance takes place within the chromosome of the bacteria, and the resulting strain of bacteria can reproduce and become dominant via natural selection. In the absence of human involvement, however, bacteria in the wild rarely develop resistance to antibiotics.In the United States, animals raised on industrial-scale factory farms are routinely administered low levels of antibiotics in their feed not as a cure for ongoing maladies, but primarily as a growth-enhancing agent to produce more meat and also as a prophylactic measure to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.Currently, several antibiotics that are used in human medical treatment are administered non-therapeutically to healthy livestock and poultry. Examples include tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin. This long-term non-therapeutic feeding of antibiotics to animals creates the ideal conditions for the development of antibioticresistant bacteria, as it kills the susceptible bacteria while leaving the resistant strains to reproduce and flourish.Europe is far ahead of the United States in the responsible use of antibiotics: On January 1, 2006, the European Union banned the feeding of all antibiotics to livestock for nontherapeutic purposes. This sweeping policy follows a 1998 ban on the non-therapeutic use of four medically-important antibiotics on animals. The time has come for the United States to follow Europe’s lead.Q.Which of the following best describes what the phrase “prophylactic measure” in the third paragraph means?

Antibiotics are chemical substances that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. The success of antibiotics against disease-causing bacteria is one of modern medicine’s great achievements. However, many bacteria harmful to humans have developed ways to circumvent the effects of antibiotics, and many infectious diseases are now much more difficult to treat than they were just a few decades ago. Antibiotic resistance is an especially difficult problem for hospitals with critically ill patients who are less able to fight off infections without the help of antibiotics.Bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance because they have the ability to adapt quickly to new environmental conditions. Most commonly, bacteria share with each other genetic material called resistance plasmids; these shared plasmids, which contain the genetic code enabling antibiotic resistance, can spread throughout a bacterial population to create a strain of resistant bacteria. Less commonly, a natural mutation that enables antibiotic resistance takes place within the chromosome of the bacteria, and the resulting strain of bacteria can reproduce and become dominant via natural selection. In the absence of human involvement, however, bacteria in the wild rarely develop resistance to antibiotics.In the United States, animals raised on industrial-scale factory farms are routinely administered low levels of antibiotics in their feed not as a cure for ongoing maladies, but primarily as a growth-enhancing agent to produce more meat and also as a prophylactic measure to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.Currently, several antibiotics that are used in human medical treatment are administered non-therapeutically to healthy livestock and poultry. Examples include tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin. This long-term non-therapeutic feeding of antibiotics to animals creates the ideal conditions for the development of antibioticresistant bacteria, as it kills the susceptible bacteria while leaving the resistant strains to reproduce and flourish.Europe is far ahead of the United States in the responsible use of antibiotics: On January 1, 2006, the European Union banned the feeding of all antibiotics to livestock for nontherapeutic purposes. This sweeping policy follows a 1998 ban on the non-therapeutic use of four medically-important antibiotics on animals. The time has come for the United States to follow Europe’s lead.Q.According to the passage, which of the following describes how bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance?

Antibiotics are chemical substances that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria. The success of antibiotics against disease-causing bacteria is one of modern medicine’s great achievements. However, many bacteria harmful to humans have developed ways to circumvent the effects of antibiotics, and many infectious diseases are now much more difficult to treat than they were just a few decades ago. Antibiotic resistance is an especially difficult problem for hospitals with critically ill patients who are less able to fight off infections without the help of antibiotics.Bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance because they have the ability to adapt quickly to new environmental conditions. Most commonly, bacteria share with each other genetic material called resistance plasmids; these shared plasmids, which contain the genetic code enabling antibiotic resistance, can spread throughout a bacterial population to create a strain of resistant bacteria. Less commonly, a natural mutation that enables antibiotic resistance takes place within the chromosome of the bacteria, and the resulting strain of bacteria can reproduce and become dominant via natural selection. In the absence of human involvement, however, bacteria in the wild rarely develop resistance to antibiotics.In the United States, animals raised on industrial-scale factory farms are routinely administered low levels of antibiotics in their feed not as a cure for ongoing maladies, but primarily as a growth-enhancing agent to produce more meat and also as a prophylactic measure to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.Currently, several antibiotics that are used in human medical treatment are administered non-therapeutically to healthy livestock and poultry. Examples include tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin. This long-term non-therapeutic feeding of antibiotics to animals creates the ideal conditions for the development of antibioticresistant bacteria, as it kills the susceptible bacteria while leaving the resistant strains to reproduce and flourish.Europe is far ahead of the United States in the responsible use of antibiotics: On January 1, 2006, the European Union banned the feeding of all antibiotics to livestock for nontherapeutic purposes. This sweeping policy follows a 1998 ban on the non-therapeutic use of four medically-important antibiotics on animals. The time has come for the United States to follow Europe’s lead.Q.The passage is primarily concerned with

Top Courses for GMAT

While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice While surgical tools are constantly being upgraded with the objective of making surgeries less invasive, a recent study has shown that in one out of every 300 cases, surgery performed using the power morcellator, a newly-developed tool used in treatment of uterine cancer, has actually resulted in the spread of the cancer in the patient’s body. However, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) plans to continue to allow the use of morcellators in oncological treatment as long as physicians stringently select the patients to whom such treatment is administered.Which of the following would be most useful in assessing the CDC’s plan?a)Whether banning the use of a surgical tool is a drawn-out process as it requires multiple levels of authorizationb)Whether patients are aware of the risks associated with surgical procedures performed using minimally invasive techniquesc)Whether some patients will continue to benefit from surgical treatments performed using power morcellators.d)Whether the effects of a surgical procedure can be determined before the procedure is performed.e)Whether other surgical tools currently in use have been known to cause negative side effects, but have not been banned by the CDC.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev