Question Description
It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It is widely known that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and our cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. Accordingly it is advised that people boost the intake of antioxidants to counter the effects of toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, the elevated levels of which are connected with various cancers. However, such advice may not have any substantial medical grounds as new research shows that tumor-promoting ROS are produced at cellular energy factories called mitochondria whereas supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell not connected with mitochondria at all.In the argument above, the two bold-face portions play which of the following roles?a)The first is a conclusion against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as evidence in support of that position.b)The first is evidence that the argument disputes; the second is an observation that supports the main conclusion drawn by the argument.c)The first acts as evidence against the position taken by the argument; the second acts as a reason in support of the position taken by the author.d)The first is a conclusion that is disputed by the argument; the second is evidence that supports that conclusion.e)The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole disputes; the second is evidence that supports the position taken by the argument.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.