GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  It may seem that no group has been hit harder... Start Learning for Free
It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
  • a)
    The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.
  • b)
    The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information. 
  • c)
    The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.
  • d)
    The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.
  • e)
    The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that information
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than th...
Argument Analysis
Pre-Thinking
Let’s look at the relationship between the two boldface portions, keeping our analysis of the two bold-face portions (as presented in the passage analysis) in mind:
Bold-face portion 1 (BF1): the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%
Bold-face portion 2 (BF2): the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work
Both BF1 and BF2 are facts. When combined with statements which immediately follow them, they are leading to two different conclusions. Let’s take a look at BF1, BF2 and the statements following them:
BF1 + Next portion of the statement: The official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole.
BF2 + Next portion of the statement: Since, the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.
Main conclusion: However, the figures may not provide the correct picture.
Intermediate conclusion: The worst – hit group could be people above 60…
BF 1 and the next portion lead to the conclusion that the young are the worst hit by the recession as they have a much higher unemployment rate than the general population. But this conclusion is disputed by the main conclusion of the argument.  The information presented in BF 2 and the adjoining portion support the intermediate conclusion drawn in favour of the main conclusion. BF2 and the connected portion suggest that says that a lot of people (above 60) are not even accounted for in the statistics as they have stopped looking for work. For such people, official unemployment rate won’t reflect their true condition. Hence, declaring that the young are the worst hit by the recession on the basis of official unemployment figures may not be correct.
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
Answer Choices
A
The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.
Incorrect
While BF1 and BF2 are both facts, they are not supporting the same conclusion as we saw during the pre-thinking phase.
B
The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information. 
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 is taken as a fact but is not challenged anywhere in the argument. Only an interpretation of BF1 is questioned. BF2 is part of the information that challenges the implication of BF1 and not BF1 itself.
C
The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 occurs earlier in the statement than the author' opinion. So it wouldn't be accurate to say it challenges the author's opinion. BF2 is part of the reasoning used to support the opinion of the author; however, BF2 doesn't provide any alternate explanation.
D
The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.
Incorrect – 2nd part wrong
While BF1 does provide data whose implications are at issue in the argument, BF2 doesn't challenge the authenticity of that data, only the implication of it.
E
The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that information.
Correct
BF1 is used as a basis to infer that young are the worst hit by the recession. This implication has been challenged by the information presented by BF2 and the statement immediately after it. Note the use of 'part of that information.'
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It may seem that no group has been hit harder by the recession than the young since the official unemployment rate for those under age 25 is 16.2%, more than double the rate for the population as a whole. However, the figures may not provide the correct picture. The worst – hit group could be people above 60, an age-group in which the impact has been so severe that people have stopped even looking for jobs. Since the government considers only those jobless people unemployed who are actively looking for work, people who stop looking are instead considered “not in the labor force,” even if they prefer to work given the opportunity.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first and second are facts used in order to support a conclusion.b)The first is an observation that is challenged by other information in the argument; the second is that information.c)The first is a consideration used to challenge the position taken by the author; the second provides an alternative explanation that supports the opinion of the author.d)The first provides certain data whose implications are at issue in the given argument; the second challenges the authenticity of that data.e)The first is used as a basis to infer an implication, the validity of which becomes doubtful in light of the other information presented in the argument; the second is a part of that informationCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev