Question Description
Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees’ performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author’s conclusion?a)Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees’ motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their workb)Whether the reviewer’s motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scalesc)Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviewsd)Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluatione)Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviewsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.