Question Description
Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) 2024 is part of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Computer Science Engineering (CSE).
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following relational schema:Suppliers(sid:integer, sname:string, city:string, street:string)Parts(pid:integer, pname:string, color:string)Catalog(sid:integer, pid:integer, cost:real)Q.Assume that, in the suppliers relation above, each supplier and each street within a city has a unique name, and (sname, city) forms a candidate key. No other functional dependencies are implied other than those implied by primary and candidate keys. Which one of the following is TRUE about the above schema?a)The schema is in BCNFb)The schema is in 3NF but not in BCNFc)The schema is in 2NF but not in 3NFd)The schema is not in 2NFCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Computer Science Engineering (CSE) tests.