The less than minimumwages for a farm labourer set by the government are:a)Rs 115b)Rs300 c)Rs 250 d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 9 Exam > Class 9 Questions > The less than minimumwages for a farm laboure...

Join the Discussion on the App

The less than minimum wages for a farm labourer set by the government are:

a)
Rs 115
b)
Rs 300
c)
Rs 250
d)
None of these

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The less than minimumwages for a farm labourer set by the government a...

The minimum wages for a farm labourer set by the government are 60 per day, but wages of farm labourers in Palampur are less than minimum wages because there is heavy competition for work among the term labourers in Palampur, so people agree to work for lower wages.

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 9 courses

Most Upvoted Answer

The less than minimumwages for a farm labourer set by the government a...

The correct answer is option 'A' - Rs 300.

Explanation:

Minimum wages are the legal minimum amount that employers are required to pay their workers. The government sets these minimum wages to ensure that workers receive fair compensation for their labor and to protect them from exploitation.

In the case of farm laborers, the government has set the minimum wage at Rs 300. This means that farm laborers should be paid at least Rs 300 for their work.

The minimum wage for farm laborers is set by the government based on various factors such as the cost of living, inflation, and the prevailing wage rates in the agricultural sector. The government takes into account the needs of the workers and the economic conditions of the industry while determining the minimum wage.

It is important to note that the minimum wage is the legal minimum and employers are required to pay their workers at least this amount. However, employers can choose to pay their workers more than the minimum wage if they wish to do so.

The purpose of setting a minimum wage for farm laborers is to ensure that they are not exploited and that they receive a fair wage for their hard work. This helps to improve the living conditions of farm laborers and ensures that they can meet their basic needs.

In conclusion, the correct answer to the question is option 'A' - Rs 300, as this is the minimum wage set by the government for farm laborers.

Answered by Dr Manju Sen · View profile

Community Answer

The less than minimumwages for a farm labourer set by the government a...

The minimum wage set by the government is Rs 115

Share via Whatsapp

Attention Class 9 Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 9 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 9.

Science Class 9

Social Studies (SST) Class 9

Mathematics (Maths) Class 9

English Class 9

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Class 9 exam

Similar Class 9 Doubts

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Does the given source explain the significance of which feature of democracy?

View answer

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Assertion (

View answer

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Which of these features is/are necessary to provide the basic rights to the citizens?

View answer

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Which of the following makes Zimbabwe undemocratic

View answer

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.What does the example of Zimbabwe show?

View answer

Top Courses for Class 9View all

Science Class 9

Social Studies (SST) Class 9

Mathematics (Maths) Class 9

English Class 9

English Grammar Advanced