Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Each of the questions below consists of a set...

Join the Discussion on the App

Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.

1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.
2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.
3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.
4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.
5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.

Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CAT Practice Test - 22

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. T...

Statement 1 starts with an article. Secondly, it introduces the topic of “human cloning”. Therefore, it is the introductory statement. Statement 5 will follow 1 since 1 mentions the controversy surrounding human cloning and 5 describes the effects of that controversy- calls for all progress to be halted. Therefore, option 4 can be eliminated. 2-3 is a pair since 2 continues the theme of banning human cloning first mentioned in statement 5. Furthermore, statement 2 mentions what type of organisations oppose reproductive cloning- one of the organisations being scientific organisations-while statement 3 gives the reason why scientific organisations want cloning to be banned; until safety issues are resolved.
Since the 1523 link has been established, statement 4 can only be the concluding statement.
Hence, the correct sequence is 15234.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. T...

Logical Order: 15234

Explanation:

Sentence 1: The various forms of human cloning are controversial.

This sentence serves as an introductory statement, presenting the topic of human cloning and highlighting its controversial nature.

Sentence 5: There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.

This sentence follows the introductory statement and provides information about the existence of demands to stop all progress in the field of human cloning. It shows that there are concerns and opposition to the development of human cloning.

Sentence 2: Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental, and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.

This sentence adds further detail by discussing the specific types of cloning and the different attitudes towards them. It highlights that while there may be opposition to therapeutic cloning, the majority of scientific, governmental, and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.

Sentence 3: Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.

This sentence builds upon the previous one by focusing on the concerns regarding reproductive cloning. It mentions that scientific organizations have made public statements calling for a ban on reproductive cloning until safety concerns are addressed. This highlights the need for caution and further research in this area.

Sentence 4: Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.

This sentence concludes the paragraph by introducing ethical concerns associated with human cloning. Specifically, it raises the issue of organ harvesting from clones, highlighting the potential ethical implications of this practice.

Overall, the logical sequence of sentences is as follows:
1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.
5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.
2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental, and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.
3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.
4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.

This sequence presents a coherent and logical progression of ideas, starting with an introduction to the topic, followed by opposition to human cloning, concerns about reproductive cloning, and finally, the ethical considerations associated with cloning.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Attention CAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.While sabbaticals are still rare inside of corporate America, their presence is increasing rapidly. According to a survey from the Society for Human Resource Management, the percentage of companies offering sabbaticals (both paid and unpai d) rose to nearly 17% of employers in 2017. That's a significant gain from 1977, when McDonald's instituted what was arguably the first corporate sabbatical program in the United States.Since the concept of sabbaticals is most popular in the academic arena, the majority of research done on their effect on employees has been conducted by studying professors. One notable study compared 129 university professors who took a sabbatical in a given term with 129 equally qualified colleagues who didn't. Both groups were surveyed before, during, and after the term to assess stress levels, psychological resources, and even overall life satisfaction. It's not surprising that the researchers found that those who took sabbaticals experienced, upon return, a decline in stress and an increase in psychological resources and overall well-being. What is surprising, however, is that those positive changes often remained long after the sabbatical takers returned to work.The bigger benefit to organizations, however, comes in unexpected ways. Providing sabbaticals or extended leave time to leaders can actually be a means to stress test the organizational chart and give aspiring leaders a chance to grow. In one study, researchers surveyed 61 leaders at five different non-profit organizations with sabbatical programs. Each organization had slightly different requirements, but all required at least three months off and discouraged executives from visiting the office during the sabbatical period.The researchers found that the majority of leaders surveyed said the time away allowed them the space to generate new ideas for innovating in the organization and helped them gain greater confidence in themselves as leaders. They also reported a better ability to collaborate with their board of directors, most likely because the planning and execution of the sabbatical provided a learning experience for everyone involved.At the very least, having people rotate out for an extended period of time allows organizations to stress test their organizational chart. Ideally, no team should be so dependent on any one person that productivity grinds to a halt during an extended vacation. And while it may look good on paper, the only way to know for sure is to test it. For instance, there are many unique vacation/sabbatical policies out there: The Motley Fool's approach, called "The Fool's Errand." Each month leadership of The Motley Fool draws a random name from the company roster and awards that person two weeks of paid time off with a catch: It must be taken in the next month.Whether it's a long-term sabbatical or a surprise vacation, the success of extended time off - for the organization - is an encouragement and a warning. The warning is that most organizations are probably not giving employees enough time away.Q. Whether it's a long-term sabbatical or a surprise vacation, the success of extended time off - for the organization - is an encouragement and a warning. The warning is that most organizations are probably not giving employees enough time away.It can be inferred that the author could have extended the last paragraph to include how many of the following statements? The encouragement is that extended time pays off. How seriously companies take this warning, is yet to be seen. Rewarding sabbatical to employees increases the productivity of the company. The pros of rewarding sabbatical to employees far outweigh the cons.

View answer

Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out.Choose its number as your answer and key it in.1. One argument is that actors that do not fit within a single, well-defined category may suffer an “illegitimacy discount”.2. Others believe that complex identities confuse audiences about an organization’s role or purpose.3. Some organizations have complex and multidimensional identities that span or combine categories, while other organizations possess narrow identities.4. Identity is one of the most important features of organizations, but there exist opposing views among sociologists about how identity affects organizational performance.5. Those who think that complex identities are beneficial point to the strategic advantages of ambiguity, and organizations’ potential to differentiate themselves from competitors. Correct answer is '1'. Can you explain this answer?

View answer

Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph.Identify the odd one out.Choose its number as your answer and key it in. 1. One argument is that actors that do not fit within a single, well-defined category may suffer an “illegitimacy discount”. 2. Others believe that complex identities confuse audiences about an organization’s role or purpose. 3. Some organizations have complex and multidimensional identities that span or combine categories, while other organizations possess narrow identities. 4. Identity is one of the most important features of organizations, but there exist opposing views among sociologists about how identity affects organizational performance. 5. Those who think that complex identities are beneficial point to the strategic advantages of ambiguity, and organizations’ potential to differentiate themselves from competitors. Correct answer is '1'. Can you explain this answer?

View answer

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience. Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self-worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact-finding authorities who used legitimate decision-making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.There is only one term in the left column which matches with the options given in the second column. Identify the correct pair from the following table

View answer

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience. Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact finding authorities who used legitimate decision making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.There is only one term in the left column which matches with the options given in the second column. Identify the correct pair from the following table

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series and 500+ Practice Tests 2024

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Each of the questions below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the options.1. The various forms of human cloning are controversial.2. Some people and groups oppose therapeutic cloning, but most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.3. Various scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.4. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by the idea that it might be possible in the future to harvest organs from clones.5. There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.Correct answer is '15234'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam