InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designersandrsquo; attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies donandrsquo;t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > InstructionsThe passage given below is follow...

Instructions
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
Q. Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.
The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.

a)
Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers' satisfaction
b)
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into being
c)
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labor
d)
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideology

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summ...

After reading the entire paragraph, it can be inferred that the main idea of the passage is that while the inventors of the open-plan offices had the liberation of office dwellers from boxes in mind, the companies used it to pack as much people as possible inside.
Option A is incorrect as the passage makes no mentions about workers satisfaction.
Option B is incorrect as it misrepresents the timeline given in the passage. Cubicles existed earlier and only later were wall free office spaces invented.
Option D is incorrect as it could not be inferred from the passage that the companies that did not believe in democratic ideology Option C correctly encapsulates the main idea of the passage and hence it is the correct answer.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summ...

Explanation:

Introduction:
The passage discusses the origins of open-plan offices and cubicles, highlighting the original intention behind their design and how they were eventually utilized by companies.

Summary Explanation:
- Option A: This option suggests that wall-free office spaces could have worked out as intended by their inventors if companies cared for workers' satisfaction. However, the passage mentions that companies primarily adopted open-plan offices to maximize space and efficiency rather than focusing on workers' well-being.
- Option B: This option states that wall-free office spaces did not work out as desired, leading to the introduction of cubicles. While this is partially true, the main reason for the shift to cubicles was not only due to the failure of open-plan offices but also because companies aimed to increase productivity by fitting more workers into limited space.
- Option C (Correct Answer): This option accurately captures the essence of the passage. It highlights that open-plan offices did not fulfill their utopian vision as they became tools for exploiting labor. Companies used this design not for democratic ideology but for maximizing the number of employees in a given space, turning offices into white-collar assembly lines.
- Option D: This option suggests that wall-free office spaces did not work out as intended because companies do not believe in democratic ideology. While this may be a contributing factor, the primary reason for the failure of open-plan offices was the exploitation of labor and the focus on efficiency over employee well-being.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

DIRECTIONS for the questions : The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.(2019)Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist. The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.

View answer

Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist. The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line.Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.

View answer

Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.The Industrial Revolution, a period of rapid industrialization from the late 18th to the early 19th century, transformed societies from agrarian economies into industrial powerhouses. Originating in Great Britain, the revolution quickly spread to other parts of Europe and North America, fundamentally altering the global economic landscape.The advent of new manufacturing processes and technologies, such as the steam engine, spinning jenny, and power loom, revolutionized production methods. These innovations led to the growth of factories and mass production, significantly increasing output and efficiency.While the Industrial Revolution spurred unprecedented economic growth and technological advancement, it also brought profound social changes. Urbanization accelerated as people moved from rural areas to cities in search of work in factories. This migration resulted in overcrowded cities, often with poor living conditions.The working class, including women and children, faced long hours, low wages, and dangerous working conditions. This exploitation eventually led to the rise of labor movements and the introduction of labor laws to protect workers rights.The Industrial Revolution also had environmental repercussions. The reliance on coal as a primary energy source led to increased air and water pollution, setting the stage for modern environmental challenges.Despite its mixed legacy, the Industrial Revolution laid the groundwork for the modern world, shaping economic structures, social dynamics, and technological progress that continue to influence our lives today.Q.Which one of the following statements, if false, could be seen as contradicting the facts/arguments in the passage?

View answer

Directions: The passage below is followed by some questions based on its content. Answer the questions on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.The Industrial Revolution, a period of rapid industrialization from the late 18th to the early 19th century, transformed societies from agrarian economies into industrial powerhouses. Originating in Great Britain, the revolution quickly spread to other parts of Europe and North America, fundamentally altering the global economic landscape.The advent of new manufacturing processes and technologies, such as the steam engine, spinning jenny, and power loom, revolutionized production methods. These innovations led to the growth of factories and mass production, significantly increasing output and efficiency.While the Industrial Revolution spurred unprecedented economic growth and technological advancement, it also brought profound social changes. Urbanization accelerated as people moved from rural areas to cities in search of work in factories. This migration resulted in overcrowded cities, often with poor living conditions.The working class, including women and children, faced long hours, low wages, and dangerous working conditions. This exploitation eventually led to the rise of labor movements and the introduction of labor laws to protect workers rights.The Industrial Revolution also had environmental repercussions. The reliance on coal as a primary energy source led to increased air and water pollution, setting the stage for modern environmental challenges.Despite its mixed legacy, the Industrial Revolution laid the groundwork for the modern world, shaping economic structures, social dynamics, and technological progress that continue to influence our lives today.Q."The working class, including women and children, faced long hours, low wages, and dangerous working conditions." In the context of the passage, which one of the following is not a possible implication of the quoted statement?

View answer

Directions: Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers "Whatever actions are done by an individual in different embodiments, [s]he reaps the fruit of those actions in those very bodies or embodiments (in future existences)".A belief in karma entails, among other things, a focus on long run consequences, i.e., a long term orientation. Such an orientation implies that people who believe in karma may be more honest with themselves in general and in setting expectations in particular-a hypothesis we examine here. This research is based on three simple premises. First, because lower expectations often lead to greater satisfaction, individuals in general, and especially those who are sensitive to the gap between performance and expectations, have the incentive to and actually do “strategically” lower their expectations. Second, individuals with a long term orientation are likely to be less inclined to lower expectations in the hope of temporarily feeling better. Third, long term orientation and the tendency to lower expectations are at least partially driven by cultural factors. In India, belief in karma, with its emphasis on a longer term orientation, will therefore to some extent counter-act the tendency to lower expectations. The empirical results support our logic; those who believe more strongly in karma are less influenced by disconfirmation sensitivity and therefore have higher expectations.Consumers make choices based on expectations of how alternative options will perform (i.e., expected utility). Expectations about the quality of a product also play a central role in subsequent satisfaction. These expectations may be based on a number of factors including the quality of a typical brand in a category, advertised quality, and disconfirmation sensitivity. Recent evidence suggests that consumers, who are more disconfirmation sensitive (i.e.,consumers who are more satisfied when products perform better than expected or more dissatisfied when products perform worse than expecte d) have lower expectations. However, there is little research concerning the role of culture-specific variables in expectation formation, particularly how they relate to the impact of disconfirmation Sensitivity on consumerQ. Which of the following statements, if true, would contradict the first of the three premises mentioned in the first paragraph?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice InstructionsThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Q.Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist.The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.a)Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers satisfactionb)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into beingc)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labord)Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideologyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam