Question Description
Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Given below is a passage followed by several statements that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. Examine each statement separately in the context of the passage and decide whether they are implied from the passage.Scientific realism is the view that we ought to believe in the unobservable entities posited by our most successful scientific theories. It is widely held that the most powerful argument in favour of scientific realism is the no-miracles argument,according to which the success of science would be miraculous if scientific theories were not at least approximately true descriptions of the world. While the underdetermination argument is often cited as giving grounds for scepticism about theories of unobservable entities, arguably the most powerful arguments against scientific realism are based on the history of radical theory change in science. The best-known of these arguments, although not necessarily the most compelling of them, is the notorious pessimistic meta-induction, according to which reflection on the abandonment of theories in the history of science motivates the expectation that our best current scientific theories will themselves be abandoned, and hence that we ought not to assent to them.Q. Which of the following statements can be implied from the passage?A. Abandonment of scientific theories provides the basis for pessimistic meta-induction.B. The understanding of the human race is at the root of all criticisms by the underdetermination argument.C. Scientific realism is reconstruction of reality through scientific theories.D. Events or phenomena conform to scientific theories because science is not miraculous.a)A onlyb)B and Cc)C and Dd)A and Ce)A and DCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.