The Veerapa Moily Commission and its recommendations

The Veerapa Moily Commission, officially known as the Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), was established in 2005 by the Government of India. The commission was tasked with examining the existing administrative system and suggesting reforms to make it more efficient, transparent, and accountable. The commission submitted its report in 2009 and made several recommendations for administrative reforms in India.

Objective of the Commission

The main objective of the Veerapa Moily Commission was to identify the areas in the administrative system that needed improvement and to suggest measures to enhance governance and public service delivery.

Recommendations of the Commission

Among the various recommendations made by the Veerapa Moily Commission, one of them was to do away with Articles 310 and 311 of the Constitution of India.

Explanation of the recommendation

Articles 310 and 311 of the Constitution of India deal with the conditions of service of government servants. Article 310 provides for the appointment, tenure, and dismissal of government servants, while Article 311 provides for the protection of government servants against arbitrary dismissal or reduction in rank.

The Veerapa Moily Commission recommended doing away with Articles 310 and 311 in order to bring about greater flexibility in the recruitment and management of government employees. The commission argued that the existing provisions of these articles were overly protective of government servants and hindered administrative efficiency.

The commission suggested that the rigid procedures for appointment, dismissal, and disciplinary action should be replaced with a more streamlined and transparent system. It recommended the introduction of a new legislation to regulate the conditions of service of government servants, which would balance the need for administrative efficiency with the protection of their rights.

Significance of the recommendation

The recommendation to do away with Articles 310 and 311 was aimed at modernizing and improving the functioning of the administrative system in India. It sought to address the issues of inefficiency, corruption, and lack of accountability that had plagued the system for many years.

The implementation of this recommendation would have allowed for greater flexibility in hiring, firing, and disciplining government employees, thereby enabling the government to build a more efficient and effective bureaucracy.

However, it is important to note that the recommendation of the Veerapa Moily Commission was just that - a recommendation. The decision to amend or remove Articles 310 and 311 lies with the government and the Parliament of India. As of now, these articles remain a part of the Constitution, and any changes to them would require a constitutional amendment.

In conclusion, the Veerapa Moily Commission recommended doing away with Articles 310 and 311 of the Constitution of India in order to bring about administrative reforms and enhance the efficiency of the bureaucratic system. However, the implementation of this recommendation is subject to the decision of the government and the Parliament.