If a statement was made to obtain acceptance from a person then it is offer.
If a statement was made to make the other party any act before acceptance is made then it is invitation to offer.

Understanding Offers vs. Invitations to Offer
To determine whether a statement is an offer or an invitation to offer, consider the following factors:
1. Intention of the Parties
- Offers are made with the intention to create a binding contract upon acceptance.
- Invitations to offer indicate a willingness to negotiate or invite offers from others.
2. Clarity and Specificity
- Offers generally contain clear and definite terms regarding price, quantity, and other essential elements.
- Invitations to offer are often vague or general, lacking the specificity necessary to form a contract.
3. Communication of Acceptance
- An offer can be accepted to form a contract, while an invitation to offer requires a response in the form of an offer from another party.
- Acceptance is a key factor in distinguishing an offer from an invitation to offer.
4. Context of the Statement
- Analyze the context in which the statement is made (e.g., advertisements, negotiations).
- Advertisements are typically considered invitations to offer, whereas a direct communication with specific terms may be viewed as an offer.
5. Legal Precedents
- Refer to landmark cases such as Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., which illustrates the line between an offer and an invitation to treat.
- Legal interpretations and case law can provide insights into how similar statements have been classified.
Conclusion
Understanding the distinction between an offer and an invitation to offer is crucial in contract law. By evaluating the intention, clarity, communication, context, and legal precedents, one can accurately ascertain the nature of a statement. This evaluation is essential for aspiring legal professionals, particularly in the CA Foundation course.