Question Description
Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Sometime in the 1940s, Enrico Fermi was talking about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence with some other physicists. They were impressed that life had evolved quickly and progressively on Earth. They figured our galaxy holds about 100 billion stars, and that an intelligent, exponentially-reproducing species could colonize the galaxy in just a few million years. They reasoned that extraterrestrial intelligence should be common by now. Fermi listened patiently, then asked, simply, So, where is everybody? That is, if extraterrestrial intelligence is common, why havent we met any bright aliens yet? This conundrum became known as Fermis Paradox.Q. Which of the following, if true, does not resolve Fermis Paradox?I. Intelligent life may be abundant in the galaxy, but the huge interstellar distances make travelling to other solar systems impossible.II. Human technological progress hints that intelligent societies that reach a particular technological level -i.e. the invention of nuclear weapons - may wind up destroying themselves in the long run.III. Travelling to other stars requires moving faster than light, which violates the laws of physics, but it is still possible to send a message that way.IV. Earth may be a strange aberration in a galaxy largely devoid of intelligent life.a)Only IIb)Only IIIc)Both I and IVd)Both II and IVe)Both I and IIICorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.