Question Description
Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Are poor people poor because of inferior genes? This notion is especially popular with members of the ruling elite, who like to think their position is the result of genetic superiority rather than the fact they have privileged backgrounds.Low intelligence and high rates of mental illness are more common in poor people. Geneticists maintain that genes play a major role in causing both. But if they were right there would be an inexorable logic that suggests inferior DNA caused poor people to sink to the bottom of the gene pool.In the light of the findings of the human genome project, however, that idea is no longer defensible - as the leading psychologist Ken Richardson recently pointed out in the house magazine of the psychology profession. On the contrary, the implication of the unimportance of genes is that if we changed society in the right ways, we could virtually eradicate not only low academic performance and mental illness but also criminality and problems such as substance abuse.Since the project published its results 16 years ago, genes have been found to have a significant influence on physical traits like height and weight, so you might have expected the same for psychology by now. But Britains leading geneticist - Robert Plomin, of Kings College, London - hasnt found any specific DNA variants that have a significant effect on differences in our psychology.Scientists call this the missing heritability. But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing - its non-existent.Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. For instance, we know for sure that what happens in the womb can have a big effect on childhood problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Its also clear that many autistic children are born with brain abnormalities. So if you have children who are terrible at maths, knowing its not their genetic destiny increases the likelihood of improvement.A classic study provided a large sample of children with the lesson that their maths ability was not fixed. Two years later their maths had improved significantly: the more children had initially believed their abilities to be fixed, the greater the improvement. Moreover, if parents and teachers believe childrens abilities are flexible, pupils are more likely to improve.As has been shown in Finland, if its assumed that every child has the potential to do well and the right resources are put into your educational system, you can end up doing well in the international league tables. The Finns achieve that without the coercion and hothousing techniques used in Singapore.Q. Of course, even if DNA variants are not found, it does not mean its all down to nurture. The assumption from the above is:a)The role of genes is ruled outb)The role of the environment is ruled outc)The role of genes cannot be ruled outd)Nature and nurture are both interdependentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.