Question Description
Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.When it comes to sustained communication with hospitalised patients about complex and chronic illness and helping them navigate the end of life, the burden on physicians has always been high, which is why its a worry when as a group, they express uncertainty about their ability to provide this core component of care. At the end of life, physicians are typically the doctors expected to explore your deepest longings and regrets, your strongest convictions and worst fears. In between, they deliberate resuscitation status, stop antibiotics, encourage palliation and provide counsel to the frazzled resident who says, He is dying but the family wants everything done. How should I respond?No matter how prepared one is for the end of life, for most of us there is accompanying consternation, grief and anxiety. One might reasonably expect a physician to be the custodian of good health but also the guarantor of comfort and dignity in death. Its clear that physicians aspire to be that doctorbut confess to needing help. In the survey, a staggering 90% of physicians thought that communication skills training should be mandatory. It isnt, you ask. No, and it has never been. Such training in medicine, especially when it pertains to end of life care, is patchy, undervalued and considered an optional extra rather than a clinical imperative. In an era where we have mapped the human genome and talk about cancer moonshots we have consistently failed to provide not just physicians, but all doctors, with the tools to be effective communicators.Its often feared that in discussing mortality a doctor will extinguish hope - and there is indeed a tension between maintaining hope and telling the truth - but patients tell us they value honesty and doctors know its the right thing to do. Becoming a tactful, sensitive and honest communicator is a lifelong process but its important enough that it shouldnt be left to chance. But this is exactly what medical schools and hospitals largely do. And then we lament that despite all the advances in medicine, doctor-patient communication remains a fraught problem that underpins a significant majority of health care complaints. Doctor-patient communication has long been viewed as an indulgence that comes at the cost of service delivery. If they are clamouring to become better communicators, its time we took note.Q. Which of the following can be inferred about physicians? a)Physicians can be trusted to be the custodians of good health.b)Physicians need proper training to treat critically ill patients.c)Physicians doubt their ability to provide the right end of life care.d)Physicians feel that discussing mortality and end of life care is not clinically relevant.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.