All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Di... Start Learning for Free
I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week. Did you see the Loch Ness monster?
Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness mo...
Explanation:

  • The given sentence is in the past tense, indicating that the action has already happened in the past.

  • The verb "fly" is in the present participle form "flying" which cannot be used to describe a past action.

  • The past tense of the verb "fly" is "flew."

  • Therefore, the correct sentence is "I flew over Loch Ness last week."

Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness mo...
The answer need to be in past tense as the sentence is talking about something that has already happened.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

A passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.In the early 1970s, a group of people led by Robert H. Rines obtained some underwater photographs. Two were rather vague images, perhaps of a rhomboid flipper (though others have dismissed the image as air bubbles or a fish fin). The alleged flipper was photographed in different positions, indicating movement. On the basis of these photographs, British naturalist Peter Scott announced in 1975 that the scientific name of the monster would henceforth be Nessiteras rhombopteryx (Greek for The Ness monster with diamond-shaped fin). Scott intended that this would enable Nessie to be added to a British register of officially protected wildlife. Scottish politician Nicholas Fairbairn pointed out that the name was an anagram for Monster hoax by Sir Peter S.The underwater photos were reportedly obtained by painstakingly examining the loch depths with sonar for unusual underwater activity. A submersible camera with an affixed, high-powered light (necessary for penetrating Loch Nesss notorious murk) was deployed to record images below the surface. Several of the photographs, despite their obviously murky quality, did indeed seem to show an animal resembling a plesiosaur in various positions and lightings. One photograph appeared to show the head, neck and upper torso of a plesiosaur-like animal. A rarely publicised photograph depicted two plesiosaur-like bodies. Another photo seemed to depict a horned gargoyle head, consistent to that ofseveral sightings of the monster. Some believe the latter to be a tree stump found during Operation Deepscan.A few close-ups of what is to be the creatures supposed diamondshaped fin were taken in different positions, as though the creature was moving. But the flipper photograph has been highly retouched from the original image. The Museum of Hoaxes shows the original unenhanced photo. Team member Charles Wyckoff claimed that someone retouched the photo to superimpose the flipper, and that the original enhancement showed a much smaller flipper. No one is exactly sure how the original came to be enhanced in this way.Q.According to the author

A passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.In the early 1970s, a group of people led by Robert H. Rines obtained some underwater photographs. Two were rather vague images, perhaps of a rhomboid flipper (though others have dismissed the image as air bubbles or a fish fin). The alleged flipper was photographed in different positions, indicating movement. On the basis of these photographs, British naturalist Peter Scott announced in 1975 that the scientific name of the monster would henceforth be Nessiteras rhombopteryx (Greek for The Ness monster with diamond-shaped fin). Scott intended that this would enable Nessie to be added to a British register of officially protected wildlife. Scottish politician Nicholas Fairbairn pointed out that the name was an anagram for Monster hoax by Sir Peter S.The underwater photos were reportedly obtained by painstakingly examining the loch depths with sonar for unusual underwater activity. A submersible camera with an affixed, high-powered light (necessary for penetrating Loch Nesss notorious murk) was deployed to record images below the surface. Several of the photographs, despite their obviously murky quality, did indeed seem to show an animal resembling a plesiosaur in various positions and lightings. One photograph appeared to show the head, neck and upper torso of a plesiosaur-like animal. A rarely publicised photograph depicted two plesiosaur-like bodies. Another photo seemed to depict a horned gargoyle head, consistent to that ofseveral sightings of the monster. Some believe the latter to be a tree stump found during Operation Deepscan.A few close-ups of what is to be the creatures supposed diamondshaped fin were taken in different positions, as though the creature was moving. But the flipper photograph has been highly retouched from the original image. The Museum of Hoaxes shows the original unenhanced photo. Team member Charles Wyckoff claimed that someone retouched the photo to superimpose the flipper, and that the original enhancement showed a much smaller flipper. No one is exactly sure how the original came to be enhanced in this way.Q.Why is the word alleged used in the statement The alleged flipper was photographed in different positions, indicating movement.?

A passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.In the early 1970s, a group of people led by Robert H. Rines obtained some underwater photographs. Two were rather vague images, perhaps of a rhomboid flipper (though others have dismissed the image as air bubbles or a fish fin). The alleged flipper was photographed in different positions, indicating movement. On the basis of these photographs, British naturalist Peter Scott announced in 1975 that the scientific name of the monster would henceforth be Nessiteras rhombopteryx (Greek for The Ness monster with diamond-shaped fin). Scott intended that this would enable Nessie to be added to a British register of officially protected wildlife. Scottish politician Nicholas Fairbairn pointed out that the name was an anagram for Monster hoax by Sir Peter S.The underwater photos were reportedly obtained by painstakingly examining the loch depths with sonar for unusual underwater activity. A submersible camera with an affixed, high-powered light (necessary for penetrating Loch Nesss notorious murk) was deployed to record images below the surface. Several of the photographs, despite their obviously murky quality, did indeed seem to show an animal resembling a plesiosaur in various positions and lightings. One photograph appeared to show the head, neck and upper torso of a plesiosaur-like animal. A rarely publicised photograph depicted two plesiosaur-like bodies. Another photo seemed to depict a horned gargoyle head, consistent to that ofseveral sightings of the monster. Some believe the latter to be a tree stump found during Operation Deepscan.A few close-ups of what is to be the creatures supposed diamondshaped fin were taken in different positions, as though the creature was moving. But the flipper photograph has been highly retouched from the original image. The Museum of Hoaxes shows the original unenhanced photo. Team member Charles Wyckoff claimed that someone retouched the photo to superimpose the flipper, and that the original enhancement showed a much smaller flipper. No one is exactly sure how the original came to be enhanced in this way.Q.From the passage, what cant be concluded about 3Marks Nessie?

The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:1. This holds troubling implications for freedom of expression and the right to information.2. However, Electronics and IT Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, while launching The Information Technology Rules, 2021, presented it as a “soft-touch oversight mechanism”, and it also claimed the rules seek to “address people’s varied concerns while removing any misapprehension about curbing creativity and freedom of speech and expression”.3. The soft tone notwithstanding, these rules force digital news publishers and video streaming services to adhere to a cumbersome three-tier structure of regulation, with a government committee at its apex.4. The new rules introduced by the Centre last week to regulate all types of digital platforms, with the idea of redressing user grievances and ensuring compliance with the law, are deeply unsettling as they will end up giving the government a good deal of leverage over online news publishers and intermediaries. Correct answer is '4123'. Can you explain this answer?

The communities of ants are sometimes very large ,numbering even up to 500, individuals and it is a lesson to us that no one has ever yet seen quarrel between any two ants belonging to the same community .On the other hand ,it must be admitted that they are in hostility not only with most other insects ,including ants of different species ,but even with those of the same species if belongs to different communities .I have over and over again introduced ants from one of my nests into another nest of the same species ; and they were in variable attacked , seized by a leg or an antenna and dragged out .It is evident therefore ,that the ants of each community all recognize one another ,which is very remarkable .But more than this ,I several times divided a nest into two halves and found that even after separation of a year and nine months they recognize one another and were perfectly friendly ,while they at once attacked ants from a different nest ,although of the same species.It has been suggested that the ant of each nest have some sign or password by which they recognize one another .To test this I made some of them insensible, first I tried chloroform; but this was fatal to them and I do not consider the test satisfactory .I decided therefore to intoxicate them. This was less easy then I had expected .None of my ants would voluntarily degrade themselves by getting drunk .However ,I got over the difficulty by putting them into whisky for a few moments .I took fifty specimens –25 percent from one nest and 25 percent from another made them dead drunk ,marked each with a spot of paint ,and put them on a table close to where other ants from one of the nests were feeding .The table was surrounded as usual with a most of water to prevent them from straying .The ants ,which were feeding soon noticed those ,which I had made drunk .They seemed quite astonished to find their comrades in such a disgraceful condition ,and as much at loss to know what to do with their drunkards as we were .After a while ,however ,they carried them all away the strangers they took to the edge of the moat and dropped into the water ,while they bore their friends home in the nest where by degrees they slept off the effects of the spirits .Thus it is evident that they know their friends even when incapable of giving any sign or password.Q.The authors anecdotes of the inebriated ants would support all the following inductions except the statement that

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice I _________ (fly) over Loch Ness last week.Did you seethe Loch Ness monster?Correct answer is 'flew'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup