History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > History, if viewed as a repository not merely...

Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph?

(2011)

a)
Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooks
b)
Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledge
c)
History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievement
d)
Textbooks may be biased

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronolo...

Option (b) which states different ways of looking at History can produce altogether different knowledge is true because each and every line of the above paragraph shows how study of History can provide altogether different knowledge. These days history is not mere date wise representation of facts rather it is turning to be scientific in its approach.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronolo...

Summary:
Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledge.

Detailed Explanation:
The passage discusses the potential transformative power of viewing history as more than just a collection of anecdotes or chronology. It argues that history, when viewed as a repository, has the ability to change the image of science that we currently possess. The image of science that we currently have is mainly derived from the study of finished scientific achievements recorded in classics and textbooks. However, the passage suggests that this image can be altered by exploring history in different ways.

Key points:
- History, if viewed as a repository, can bring about a decisive transformation in the image of science.
- The current image of science is largely based on the study of finished scientific achievements recorded in classics and textbooks.
- Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledge.

Analysis:
The answer choice that best summarizes the passage is option B: Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledge. This choice captures the central idea of the passage, which is that viewing history in different ways can lead to a transformation in our understanding of science. The passage suggests that the current image of science is limited because it is primarily based on the study of finished scientific achievements recorded in classics and textbooks. By exploring history in different ways, we can gain new knowledge and perspectives that may challenge or expand our current understanding of science.

Conclusion:
The passage argues that history, when viewed as more than just a collection of anecdotes or chronology, has the potential to transform our image of science. By exploring history in different ways, we can gain new knowledge and perspectives that may challenge or expand our current understanding of science. This idea is summarized in option B: Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledge.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers.There is an essential and irreducible 'duality' in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her 'agency', recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her 'well-being'. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a person's agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person's agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one's agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the 'agency aspect' and the 'well-being aspect' of a person does not require us to take the view that the person's success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person's well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q. Of the options presented below, which one is the best example for the ideas propounded in the passage?

View answer

DIRECTION for the question: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.There is an essential and irreducible duality in the normative conceptualisation of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her agency, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her well-being. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a persons agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the persons agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of ones agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person does not require us to take the view that the persons success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a persons well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q.Of the options presented below, which one is the best example for the ideas propounded in the passage?

View answer

DIRECTION for the question: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.There is an essential and irreducible duality in the normative conceptualisation of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her agency, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her well-being. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a persons agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the persons agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of ones agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person does not require us to take the view that the persons success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a persons well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.In the case of Japan, there is a strong empirical evidence to suggest that systematic departure from self-interested behaviour, in the direction of duty, loyalty and goodwill have played a substantial part in industrial success.Q. Which of the following is closest to the ideas presented in the passage?

View answer

Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers.There is an essential and irreducible 'duality' in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her 'agency', recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her 'well-being'. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a person's agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person's agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one's agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the 'agency aspect' and the 'well-being aspect' of a person does not require us to take the view that the person's success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person's well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q. Read the sentences given below and choose the option that is best in accordance with the ideas in the passage.I. There is a need to distinguish between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person.II. A person can be conceptualized in terms of either agency or well-being.III. A person is important, not just instrumentally, for the pursuit of wellbeing

View answer

Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers.There is an essential and irreducible 'duality' in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her 'agency', recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her 'well-being'. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a person's agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person's agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one's agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the 'agency aspect' and the 'well-being aspect' of a person does not require us to take the view that the person's success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person's well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q. Which of the following in closest to the ideas presented in the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Verbal Ability (VA) & Reading Comprehension (RC)

Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Top Courses for CAT

View all

History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice History, if viewed as a repository not merely of anecdotes or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. The image has previously been drawn, even by scientists themselves, mainly from the study of finished scientific achievements as these are recorded in the classics and more recently, in the textbooks from which each new scientific generation learns to practice its trade.Q. Which of the following best summarises the above paragraph? (2011)a)Scientific achievements are recorded in classics and textbooksb)Different ways of looking at history can produce altogether different knowledgec)History of science can be inferred from finished scientific achievementd)Textbooks may be biasedCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam