Home vs House:

A house is a physical structure that provides shelter and protection, whereas a home is a place where a person feels safe, comfortable, and loved. While a house can be considered a home, not all houses are homes. In the given scenario, the footpath does not qualify as a house, but it can still be considered a home for the child.

Living on a Footpath:

The Footpath as a House:
A footpath is an outdoor space, typically meant for walking, and it does not meet the criteria of a house. It lacks walls, a roof, and other essential features that define a house. It cannot provide the necessary protection from the elements such as rain, wind, or extreme temperatures. Therefore, in terms of being a house, the footpath falls short.

The Footpath as a Home:
However, a home is not solely defined by its physical attributes. It is a place where one feels a sense of belonging, security, and emotional well-being. It is a place where one can find comfort, love, and support. The footpath, though not a conventional home, can still provide some elements of a home for the child.

Emotional Aspect:
A home is more than just a physical structure. It is a place where a person feels emotionally connected and cared for. Even though the child may not have a proper house, they can still find a sense of home on the footpath if they have supportive relationships and a feeling of belonging within their community. The child may find solace and companionship among other individuals living on the footpath or from kind-hearted passersby who offer help and support.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the footpath may not be considered a house, it can still be a home for the child in terms of emotional well-being, a sense of belonging, and finding support within their community. Home is not solely defined by the physical structure, but rather by the emotional connections and sense of security one feels.