Question Description
The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions:a) Youngsters ride their bicycles less carefully when they wear helmets.b) The government has mandated a set of safety standards for manufacturers of bicycle helmets.c) Children are more likely to be injured riding their bicycles than playing football.d) More children ride bicycles than play football.e) Bicycle helmets are less likely to meet the government’s helmet safety standards than are football helmets, which are subject to the safety standards.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.