The correct answer is option 'A' - The Disabled Olympics.

Explanation:
-------------------

The scientist in question was deadly against the Disabled Olympics. Here's a detailed explanation:

1. The Scientist:
The question mentions a scientist who held a strong opposition or disagreement towards a particular topic or event. While the name of the scientist is not provided, the focus is on understanding the topic against which the scientist was opposed.

2. The Disabled Olympics:
The Disabled Olympics, also known as the Paralympic Games, is an international multi-sport event for athletes with disabilities. It is held parallel to the Olympic Games and showcases the athletic abilities of individuals with physical, intellectual, or visual impairments.

3. Opposition of the Scientist:
The scientist mentioned in the question was against the Disabled Olympics. However, the reasons behind this opposition are not provided. It could be speculated that the scientist held a negative view towards the event due to various reasons such as:

a) Ethical Concerns: The scientist might have ethical concerns regarding the competitiveness and fairness of the Disabled Olympics. They could argue that athletes with disabilities may have an unfair advantage or disadvantage compared to their non-disabled counterparts.

b) Resource Allocation: The scientist might have believed that resources allocated to organizing the Disabled Olympics could be better utilized in other areas such as medical research, rehabilitation programs, or improving accessibility and inclusivity for individuals with disabilities.

c) Social Stigma: The scientist might have been against the idea of segregating athletes with disabilities in a separate event. They might argue that including athletes with disabilities in the mainstream Olympics would help break down social stigmas and promote inclusivity.

d) Scientific Perspectives: The scientist might have had scientific evidence or research that questioned the effectiveness or impact of the Disabled Olympics. They might have argued that the event did not contribute significantly to the overall well-being or development of individuals with disabilities.

4. Conclusion:
While the exact reasons behind the scientist's opposition to the Disabled Olympics are not provided, it is clear that the scientist strongly disagreed with the event. Understanding the specific arguments or concerns of the scientist would require further information.