All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Study the data given in the table below and ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:
All figures are in percentage
Based on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.
Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:
Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.
Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.
Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?
  • a)
    Inference I alone is correct.
  • b)
    Inference II alone is correct.
  • c)
    Either of the inferences is correct.
  • d)
    Neither of the inference is correct.
  • e)
    Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that ...
Since no data is given on population as well as distribution of states into four zones, it is not possible to calculate per thousand numbers.
View all questions of this test
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Governments have been protecting trade names and trademarks used in relation to food products identified with a particular region since at least the end of the nineteenth century, using laws against false trade descriptions or passing off, which generally protect against suggestions that a product has a certain origin, quality or association when it does not. In such cases the consumer protection benefit is generally considered to outweigh the limitation on competitive freedoms represented by the grant of a monopoly of use over a geographical indication. In many countries the protection afforded to geographical indications by law is similar to the protection afforded to trademarks, and in particular, certification marks. Geographical indications law restricts the use of the Gl for the purpose of identifying a particular type of product, unless the product or its constitute materials originate from aparticular area and/or meet certain standards. Sometimes these laws also stipulate that the product must meet certain quality tests that are administered by an association that owns the exclusive right to the use of the indication.Although a Gl is not strictly a type of trademark as it does not serve to exclusively identify a specific commercial enterprise, there are usually prohibitions against registration of a trademark which constitutes a geographical indication. In countries that do not specifically recognize GIs, regional trade associations may implement them in terms of certification marks. Geographical indications have long been associated with Europe as an entity, where there is a tradition of associating certain food products with particular regions. Under European Union Law, the protected designation of origin system which came into effect in 1992 regulates the following geographical indications: Protected designation of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indication (PGI) and Traditional Specialty Guaranteed (TSG).The system used in France from the early part of the twentieth century is known as the appellation dorigine controlee (AOC). Items that meet geographical origin and quality standards may be endorsed with a government-issued stamp which acts as official certification of the origins andstandards of the product to the consumer. Examples of products that have such appellations of origin include Tequila (spirits), Jaffa (oranges) and Bordeaux (wines).The consumer-benefit purpose of the monopoly rights granted to the owner of a Gl also applies to the trademark monopoly right. Geographical indicationshave other similarities with trademarks. For example, they must be registered in order to qualify for protection, and they must meet certain conditions in order to qualify for registration. One of the most important conditions that most governments have required before registering a name as a Gl is that the name must not already be in widespread use as the generic name for a similar product. Of course, what is considered a very specific term for a well- known local specialty in one country may constitute a generic term or genericized trademark for that type of product. For example, Parmigiano cheese in Italy is generically known as Parmesan cheese in Australia and the United States. Like trademarks, geographical indications are regulated locally by each country because conditions of registration such as differences in the generic use of terms vary from country to country. This is especially true of food and beverage names which frequently use geographical terms, but it may also be true of other products such as carpets (e.g. Shiraz), handicrafts, flowers and perfumes. International trade made it important to try to harmonize the different approaches and standards that governments used to register GIs. The first attempts to do so were found in the Paris Convention on trademarks (1883), followed by a much more elaborate provision in the 1958 Lisbon Agreement on the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their Registration. Few countries joined the Lisbon agreement, however: by 1997 there were only 17 members (Algeria, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Congo, Cuba, Czech Republic, France, Gabon, Haiti, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico,Portugal, Slovakia, Togo, Tunisi

Read the passage and answer the questions that followMany readers, I suspect, will take the title of this article [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things] as suggesting that women, fire, and dangerous things have something in common—say, that women are fiery and dangerous. Most feminists I’ve mentioned it to have loved the title for that reason, though some have hated it for the same reason. But the chain of inference—from conjunction to categorization to commonality—is the norm. The inference is based on the common idea of what it means to be in the same category: things are categorized together on the basis of what they have in common. The idea that categories are defined by common properties is not only our everyday folk theory of what a category is, it is also the principle technical theory—one that has been with us for more than two thousand years.The classical view that categories are based on shared properties is not entirely wrong. We often do categorize things on that basis. But that is only a small part of the story. In recent years it has become clear that categorization is far more complex than that. A new theory of categorization, called prototype theory, has emerged. It shows that human categorization is based on principles that extend far beyond those envisioned in the classical theory. One of our goals is to survey the complexities of the way people really categorize. For example, the title of this book was inspired by the Australian aboriginal language Dyirbal, which has a category, balan, that actually includes women, fire, and dangerous things. It also includes birds that are not dangerous, as well as exceptional animals, such as the platypus, bandicoot, and echidna. This is not simply a matter of categorization by common properties.Categorization is not a matter to be taken lightly. There is nothing more basic than categorization to our thought, perception, action and speech. Every time we see something as a kind of thing, for example, a tree, we are categorizing. Whenever we reason about kinds of things—chairs, nations, illnesses, emotions, any kind of thing at all—we are employing categories. Whenever we intentionally perform any kind of action, say something as mundane as writing with a pencil, hammering with a hammer, or ironing clothes, we are using categories. The particular action we perform on that occasion is a kind of motor activity, that is, it is in a particular category of motor actions. They are never done in exactly the same way, yet despite the differences in particular movements, they are all movements of a kind, and we know how to make movements of that kind. And any time we either produce or understand any utterance of any reasonable length, we are employing dozens if not hundreds of categories: categories of speech sounds, of words, of phrases and clauses, as well as conceptual categories. Without the ability to categorize, we could not function at all, either in the physical world or in our social and intellectual lives.Which one of the following facts would most weaken the significance of the author’s title?

Read the passage and answer the questions that followMany readers, I suspect, will take the title of this article [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things] as suggesting that women, fire, and dangerous things have something in common—say, that women are fiery and dangerous. Most feminists I’ve mentioned it to have loved the title for that reason, though some have hated it for the same reason. But the chain of inference—from conjunction to categorization to commonality—is the norm. The inference is based on the common idea of what it means to be in the same category: things are categorized together on the basis of what they have in common. The idea that categories are defined by common properties is not only our everyday folk theory of what a category is, it is also the principle technical theory—one that has been with us for more than two thousand years.The classical view that categories are based on shared properties is not entirely wrong. We often do categorize things on that basis. But that is only a small part of the story. In recent years it has become clear that categorization is far more complex than that. A new theory of categorization, called prototype theory, has emerged. It shows that human categorization is based on principles that extend far beyond those envisioned in the classical theory. One of our goals is to survey the complexities of the way people really categorize. For example, the title of this book was inspired by the Australian aboriginal language Dyirbal, which has a category, balan, that actually includes women, fire, and dangerous things. It also includes birds that are not dangerous, as well as exceptional animals, such as the platypus, bandicoot, and echidna. This is not simply a matter of categorization by common properties.Categorization is not a matter to be taken lightly. There is nothing more basic than categorization to our thought, perception, action and speech. Every time we see something as a kind of thing, for example, a tree, we are categorizing. Whenever we reason about kinds of things—chairs, nations, illnesses, emotions, any kind of thing at all—we are employing categories. Whenever we intentionally perform any kind of action, say something as mundane as writing with a pencil, hammering with a hammer, or ironing clothes, we are using categories. The particular action we perform on that occasion is a kind of motor activity, that is, it is in a particular category of motor actions. They are never done in exactly the same way, yet despite the differences in particular movements, they are all movements of a kind, and we know how to make movements of that kind. And any time we either produce or understand any utterance of any reasonable length, we are employing dozens if not hundreds of categories: categories of speech sounds, of words, of phrases and clauses, as well as conceptual categories. Without the ability to categorize, we could not function at all, either in the physical world or in our social and intellectual lives.The author probably chose Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things as the title of the article becauseI. he thought that since the Dyirbal placed all three items in the same category, women, fire, and dangerous things necessarily had something in common.II. he was hoping to draw attention to the fact that because items have been placed in the same category doesn’t mean that they necessarily have anything in commonIII. he wanted to use the Dyirbal classification system as an example of how primitive classifications are not as functional as contemporary Western classification systems.

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Study the data given in the table below and answer the question that follow:All figures are in percentageBased on survey of ‘shop types’ Kamath categorized Indian states into four geographical regions as shown in the table above. His boss felt that the categorization was inadequate since important labels were missing. Kamath argued that no further labels are required to interpret the data.Q. A consultant observing the data made the following two inferences:Inference I: The number of Grocers per-thousand-population is the highest in North India.Inference II: The number of Cosmetic per-thousand-population is the highest in South India.Which of following options is DEFINITELY correct?a)Inference I alone is correct.b)Inference II alone is correct.c)Either of the inferences is correct.d)Neither of the inference is correct.e)Inference I will be correct only if inference II is correct.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup