Brittle fracture is more dangerous than ductile fracture becausea)no w...
Brittle fracture is more dangerous than ductile fracture because of several reasons. Let's discuss each reason in detail.
No warning sign:
- Brittle materials do not show any warning signs before fracturing, unlike ductile materials.
- Ductile materials undergo plastic deformation before fracturing, which gives a warning sign to prevent catastrophic failure.
- Brittle fracture can occur suddenly without any warning sign, making it more dangerous.
Crack propagates at a very high speed:
- In brittle materials, the crack propagates at a very high speed once it starts.
- Due to the absence of warning signs, there is no time to detect and control the crack propagation.
- The high-speed crack propagation can cause catastrophic failure in a very short time.
No need for extra stress during crack propagation:
- Brittle fracture can occur even at a low level of stress, which makes it more dangerous.
- In ductile fracture, the crack propagation requires extra stress to continue, which can be controlled to prevent catastrophic failure.
All of these:
- All the above reasons make brittle fracture more dangerous than ductile fracture.
- The absence of warning signs, high-speed crack propagation, and no need for extra stress during crack propagation can cause catastrophic failure in a very short time.
Therefore, it is important to understand the differences between brittle and ductile fracture and take appropriate precautions to prevent catastrophic failure in brittle materials.
Brittle fracture is more dangerous than ductile fracture becausea)no w...
Option D is the correct answer because it breaks without warning at ultimate point due to high crack propagation speed
crack propagation speed is high in brittle material than ductile material due to higher stress concenntration effect