CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the mos... Start Learning for Free
DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.
Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You don't have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend 'disintermediation'. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now it's happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then it's a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.
  • a)
    Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverables
  • b)
    Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie company's claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business models
  • c)
    Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be one's success only amounts to empty bluster
  • d)
    Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by some
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for...
Option 4 is the best answer.
 Option 1 is incorrect, as Uber brings something to the table, though not to the degree it claims.
► Option 2 is a close option but commits the mistake of highlighting ''economics'' instead of ''businesses''. Business models are being discussed in the paragraph, and not economics.
► Option 3 is incorrect as ''no periodic cycles'' have been mentioned in the given paragraph.
► Option 4 is the perfect representation for the paragraph as it essentially points out the significant points of the paragraph.
Free Test
Community Answer
DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for...
Explanation:

Summary:
- The paragraph discusses how Uber fits into the tech industry's narrative of "creative destruction" and how it is not a radical innovation but rather a form of disintermediation.
- It highlights that businesses like Uber are not as groundbreaking as they claim to be, as they are essentially re-using established business models in a new context.

Key Points:
- Uber is portrayed as part of the tech industry's narrative of "creative destruction."
- The paragraph criticizes Uber's claim to innovation, stating that it is simply a form of disintermediation.
- It argues that businesses like Uber are not as innovative as they claim to be, as they are essentially using old business models in a new context.
- The paragraph questions the idea that Uber represents true technological innovation, suggesting that it is a re-hashed version of an established business model.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. In many countries, the desired results of technology could not be achieved due to

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a key benefit of adopting technology?

Directions : Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given after the passage. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.States are highly competitive actors and the competitiveness that exists between them has become increasingly intensified as the world order has become ever more globalised. In order to be successful and prosperous in this competitive environ­ment states require access to reliable intelligence that reveals the strengths and weaknesses of their competitors. Knowledge is power, after all.A significant amount of intelligence collected by states is from sources which are publicly available. Espionage is a prevalent method of gathering intelligence and describes 'the consciously deceitful collection of information, ordered by a govern­ment or organisation hostile to or suspicious of those the information concerns, accomplished by humans unauthorised by the target to do the collecting'. Espio­nage, then, is the unauthorised collection of non-publicly available information. The act of espionage can be committed through various methods. In its traditional conception, espionage describes the practice whereby a state dispatches an agent into the physical territory of another state in order to access and obtain confidential information. States have, however, exploited technological developments in order to devise more effective methods through which to conduct espionage. Since the emergence of vessels, aeroplanes and celestial bodies, the sea, the skies and outer space have all been used as platforms to engage in (often electroni c) surveillance of adversaries; that is, to commit espionage from afar. It therefore comes as no surprise that since its creation cyberspace has also been harnessed as a medium through which to commit espionage. Indeed, the exploitation of cyberspace for the purpose of espionage has emerged as a particularly attractive method to acquire confidential information because of the large amount of information that is now stored in cyberspace and because cyberspace affords a considerable degree of ano­nymity to perpetrators of espionage and is thus a relatively risk free enterprise.Unsurprisingly, espionage has 'metastasised' since the emergence of cyber­space and reports suggest that cyber espionage projects are now prevalent. As an illustration, in February 2013 the Mandiant Report identified China as a persis­tent perpetrator of cyber espionage. In fact, the report claims that a cyber espio­nage entity known as Unit 61398 has been specifically created by the Chinese gov­ernment and is formally incorporated into the Chinese People's Liberation Army. The Report suggests that Unit 61398 is responsible for organising and instigating a massive cyber espionage campaign against other states and non-state actors, seek­ing to exploit vulnerable computer systems in order to access sensitive and confi­dential information with the aim of bolstering China's position in the international political and economic order. Only four months later in June 2013 cyber espionage was again thrust firmly into the international spotlight when Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the US National Security Agency (NS

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.At the core of DT is the concept of disruption. Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In todays digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.Q. According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about Digital Transformation (DT)?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.At the core of DT is the concept of disruption. Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In todays digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.Q. Which of the following can be inferred as a consequence of the disruption caused by DT?

Top Courses for CAT

DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Uber fits neatly into the mythology of the tech industry, which portrays itself as surfing one of the waves of "creative destruction" through which capitalism periodically renews itself. In this narrative, industrial progress involves a good deal of destruction in order to make way for new, creative, wealth-creating industries. The abolition of old timers such as licensed taxi cabs, travel agents and bookshops etc is merely the collateral damage of an essentially benign process " regrettable but necessary casualties of innovation. You dont have to be much of a sceptic to spot that this is self-serving cant. Far from being a radical innovation, Uber is a classic example of something as old as the internet itself, namely our old friend disintermediation. The idea is to find a business in which the need of buyers to find sellers (and vice versa) has traditionally been handled by an intermediary, and then use networking technology to eliminate said middle man. It happened a very long time ago to travel agents and bookshops. Now its happening to taxi firms. If this is technological innovation, then its a pretty low-IQ manifestation of it.a)Companies such as Uber only bring bluster to the table and very little in terms of actual deliverablesb)Economics still runs on the same tenets, with newbie companys claim to fame being re-hashed versions of essentially age-old established business modelsc)Businesses undergo periodic cycles of rejuvenation and claiming this to be ones success only amounts to empty blusterd)Businesses, which essentially have a technique that is already well-established in the current age, do not have the claim to fame as touted by someCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev