DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/...

Join the Discussion on the App

DIRECTIONS for the question: Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.

To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.

The following graph show's the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.

Q. How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?

a)
3
b)
4
c)
5
d)
Either 3 or 4

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CAT Practice Test - 7

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer ...

There is a drop for Youth in Goa, Equality in Ahmedabad and Justice in Patna.

Thus, we can conclude the following.
Youth ⇒ car burnt in Goa
Equality ⇒ car burnt in Ahmedabad
Justice ⇒ car burnt in Patna

Here, n is 3, 4, 5, for these organization.
Now, old car exchanged with a new car must have dropped the average odometer reading.

But we notice only 1 drop each in Youth, Equality and Justice. This means that the new car must have been added in the same city in which another car was burnt.

For the time being, we will assume that old car was not exchanged with new car.
In case the car wasn’t burnt in Goa by a protestor from Youth, the average odometer reading would have been 38400 kms but it is 26000 kms only.

If there were n cars in youth and the car had travelled x kms when it got burnt then

Solving n cannot be 4 or 5, thus n can be 3 only.

Thus n can be 4 only
And for the 3^rdorganization,

Which yields n = 4.
Possibilities in the value of n will get altered if we consider the exchanged car.

Since equality and justice both cannot have 4 cars each, the exchange must have happened in one of these two organizations only. Hence for YOUTH, the number of cars was 3.

One car was burnt in Goa whose odometer reading (when burnt) was (38400 × 3) – (26000 × 2) = 63200 kms
The organization that exchanged a car must have started with 5 cars.

YOUTH started with 3 cars.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.In which city was the old car exchanged for a new car?

View answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.What was the odometer reading of the car that was burnt in Goa, when it started the rally?

View answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.If one of the cars that was burnt had 69200 kms as its odometer reading, what was the odometer reading of the old car that was exchanged for a new car at the time exchange?

View answer

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience. Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self-worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact-finding authorities who used legitimate decision-making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.For summarizing the passage, which of the following is most appropriate

View answer

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience.Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact finding authorities who used legitimate decision making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.For summarizing the passage, which of the following is most appropriate

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONSfor the question:Analyse the graph/s given below and answer the question that follows.To protest against the recent hike in college fees, three student organisations - Youth. Equality and Justice took out a car rally with a fleet of 3 cars. 4 cars and 5 cars, not necessarily in the same order. The round route for the rally was Delhi - Patna - Goa -Alimedabad - Delhi. Delhi is the home city* whereas Patna. Goa and Ahmedabad are intermediate cities. The route is as shown below.The following graph shows the average odometer reading of the cars used by the organisations at the given cities, just before their departure for the next city. Each organisation burnt one of their cars, in three different intermediate cities. The burnt cars each had clocked between 50.000 km and 70.000 km on their respective odometer (The burnt cars do not figure m the average after they get burnt.) Also, one of the organisations exchanged one of their old cars with a brand new car at one of the intermediate cities. No other Cars were burnt or exchanged.Q.How many cars did the organisation Youth start with?a)3b)4c)5d)Either 3 or 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam