FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT :
(1)These are negative as they prohibit the state from doing certain things.
(2)Justiciable.
(3)aim to establish political democracy in the country.
(4)legal sanctions.
DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES :
(1)These are positive as they require the state to do certain things .
(2) non-justiciable
(3)aim to establish social and economic democracy in the country.
(4)moral and political sanctions.

Difference between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles

Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are two important aspects of the Indian Constitution that aim to ensure the welfare and development of the citizens. While both are crucial for a just and equitable society, there are several differences between them.

1. Definition:
Fundamental Rights are the basic rights guaranteed to the citizens of India, which are enforceable by law. These rights are essential for the protection of individual liberty and ensure equality before the law. On the other hand, Directive Principles of State Policy are guidelines or principles given to the government to promote social and economic democracy. They are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be enforced in the court of law.

2. Enforceability:
Fundamental Rights are justiciable, meaning if these rights are violated, individuals can approach the courts for their enforcement. The judiciary has the power to strike down any law or action that violates these rights. In contrast, Directive Principles are non-justiciable, and the courts cannot enforce them. However, they serve as a moral and political obligation for the government to strive towards their implementation.

3. Individual vs. State:
Fundamental Rights primarily focus on the rights of individuals and protect them from any infringement by the state or any other individual. These rights include the right to equality, right to freedom of speech and expression, right to life and personal liberty, etc. On the other hand, Directive Principles are aimed at guiding the state in the formulation and implementation of policies and programs to promote the welfare and development of the society as a whole.

4. Immediate vs. Long-term:
Fundamental Rights are immediate in nature and can be exercised and enjoyed by individuals from the moment they are granted. They provide immediate protection and relief to individuals against any infringement. In contrast, Directive Principles focus on long-term goals and objectives. They provide a roadmap for the government to create a just and equal society over a period of time by implementing policies and programs.

5. Conflict Resolution:
In case of a conflict between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, the former takes precedence. If a law or action violates any Fundamental Right, it can be struck down by the judiciary. However, if the government fails to implement the Directive Principles due to financial constraints or other reasons, it cannot be challenged in the court of law.

In conclusion, while both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are crucial components of the Indian Constitution, they differ in terms of enforceability, focus, nature, and resolution of conflicts. Fundamental Rights provide immediate protection to individual liberties, while Directive Principles guide the government in achieving societal welfare and development over a period of time.