Railways Exam  >  Railways Questions  >   Each question given below consists of a stat... Start Learning for Free
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.
II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.
  • a)
    If only the argument I is strong.
  • b)
    If only argument II is strong.
  • c)
    If either I or II is strong.
  • d)
    If neither I nor II is strong.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two ar...
The luxury hotels are a mark of a country's standard and a place for affluent foreign tourists. So, argument II holds. The argument I is not a strong reason because a ban on hotels is not a way to do away with the activities of international criminals.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for Railways exam

Similar Railways Doubts

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Railways. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Railways Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.a)If only the argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Railways tests.
Explore Courses for Railways exam

Top Courses for Railways

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev