All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 11 Exam  >  Class 11 Questions  >   Who according to the counsel was the culprit... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?
  • a)
    The King
  • b)
    The crown
  • c)
    The arch
  • d)
    The chief of the builders
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before ...
It shows the councillor’s sycophancy and the King’s capriciousness. The councillor, an expert in the art of flattery, checked the king from an absurd action, through an argument that appeared logical. The thoughtless king mused over it.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before ...
According to the counsel, the culprit that was brought before the King was the arch (option C).

Explanation:
The question is based on a situation or scenario where a culprit is brought before the King. The options provided are the King, the crown, the arch, and the chief of the builders.

The King: The King cannot be the culprit as he is the one who holds the highest authority and power in the kingdom. It would be highly unlikely for the King to be accused of any wrongdoing and brought before himself.

The Crown: The crown refers to the symbol of power and authority worn by the King. It is an inanimate object and cannot be considered a culprit.

The Arch: The arch is a structure that is often used in architecture to create a curved or semicircular opening. In this context, it is likely that the culprit being brought before the King is a person with the title of "arch" or "architect". This could be someone who was involved in the construction or design of a building or structure that has been deemed faulty or responsible for some kind of incident or accident.

The Chief of the Builders: While the chief of the builders may be responsible for overseeing construction projects, they are not necessarily the one directly involved in the design or implementation of the faulty structure. They may have delegated tasks to other builders and architects, making them less likely to be the main culprit.

Therefore, the most plausible answer is option C, the arch, as it is the person directly involved in the design or construction of the faulty structure that has caused the problem.
Attention Class 11 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 11 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 11.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Similar Class 11 Doubts

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. Which of the followings was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert?

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In ancient Greece, who is best known for his atomic hypothesis?

Top Courses for Class 11View all

Top Courses for Class 11

Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 11 2024 is part of Class 11 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 11 exam syllabus. Information about Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 11 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 11. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 11 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Who according to the counsel was the culprit that was brought before the King?a)The Kingb)The crownc)The archd)The chief of the buildersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 11 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Top Courses for Class 11

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup