Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >   What was distinctive (special) about Eco's a... Start Learning for Free
What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?
  • a)
    His realistic narrative style with trial and errors
  • b)
    his interrogative style
  • c)
    his monotonous unrealistic style
  • d)
    fictitious imaginative style
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)H...
Eco’s writing style was a personalised and interesting one, contrary to regular academic writings. In his writings, he told the story of his research, instead of simply presenting his research, which gave his academic writing a narrative quality.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)H...
Eco's academic writing style was distinctive and special because of his realistic narrative style with trial and errors.

1. Realistic Narrative Style:
Eco's academic writing style was characterized by a realistic narrative approach. He often presented his arguments and ideas in a narrative form, using examples, anecdotes, and real-life situations to illustrate his points. This made his writing style engaging and relatable to readers.

2. Trial and Error:
Another distinctive feature of Eco's writing style was his willingness to explore different ideas and perspectives through a process of trial and error. He was not afraid to present multiple viewpoints or consider alternative interpretations of a topic. This approach gave his writing a sense of intellectual curiosity and open-mindedness.

3. Attention to Detail:
Eco's writing style also stood out because of his meticulous attention to detail. He was known for his extensive research and comprehensive analysis of various subjects. His writing was rich in references, citations, and evidence, which added depth and credibility to his arguments.

4. Clarity and Precision:
Although Eco's writing style was complex and scholarly, he maintained clarity and precision in his language. He avoided unnecessary jargon or obscure terminology, making his ideas accessible to a wide range of readers. His writing was characterized by logical reasoning and clear explanations, ensuring that readers could follow his arguments easily.

5. Interdisciplinary Approach:
Eco's academic writing style was interdisciplinary in nature. He drew insights and ideas from various fields such as semiotics, philosophy, literature, and cultural studies. This interdisciplinary approach enriched his writing, allowing him to make connections and offer unique perspectives on complex topics.

In conclusion, Eco's academic writing style was distinctive due to his realistic narrative style with trial and errors. His ability to present complex ideas in a relatable and engaging manner, combined with meticulous attention to detail and clarity of language, made his writing highly influential and respected in academic circles.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

With an aim to check flow of black money and evasion of taxes through stock market, market regulator SEBI has decided to impose hefty penalty on brokers facilitating such transactions from tomorrow. The regulator recently came across a loophole in its existing regulations, which was being abused by stock brokers for facilitating tax evasion and flow of black money through fictitious trades in lieu of hefty commissions. To remove this anomaly, SEBI has asked stock exchanges to penalise the brokers transferring trades from one trading account to another after terming them as ‘punching’ errors. The penalty could be as high as 2% of the value of shares traded in the ‘wrong’ account, as per new rules coming into effect from August 1.In a widely-prevalent, but secretly operated practice, the people looking to evade taxes approach certain brokers to show losses in their stock trading accounts, so that their earnings from other sources are not taxed. These brokers are also approached by people looking to show their black money as earnings made through stock market. In exchange for a commission, generally 5-10% of the total amount, these brokers show desired profits or losses in the accounts of their clients after transferring trades from other accounts, created for such purposes only.The brokers generally keep conducting both ‘buy’ and ‘sell’ trades in these fictitious accounts so that they can be used accordingly when approached by such clients.In the market parlance, these deals are known as profit or loss shopping. While profit is purchased to show black money as earnings from the market, the losses are purchased to avoid tax on earnings from other sources.As the transfer of trades is not allowed from one account to the other in general cases, the brokers show the trades conducted in their own fictitious accounts as ‘punching’ errors. The regulations allow transfer of trades in the cases of genuine errors, as at times ‘punching’ or placing of orders can be made for a wrong client. To check any abuse of this rule, SEBI has asked the bourses to put in place a robust mechanism to identify whether the errors are genuine or not. At the same time, the bourses have been asked to levy penalty on the brokers transferring their non-institutional trades from one account to the other. The penalty would be 1% of the traded value in wrong account, if such trades are up to 5% of the broker’s total non-institutional turnover in a month. The penalty would be 2% of trade value in wrong account, if such transactions exceed 5% of total monthly turnover in a month.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that

With an aim to check flow of black money and evasion of taxes through stock market, market regulator SEBI has decided to impose hefty penalty on brokers facilitating such transactions from tomorrow. The regulator recently came across a loophole in its existing regulations, which was being abused by stock brokers for facilitating tax evasion and flow of black money through fictitious trades in lieu of hefty commissions. To remove this anomaly, SEBI has asked stock exchanges to penalise the brokers transferring trades from one trading account to another after terming them as ‘punching’ errors. The penalty could be as high as 2% of the value of shares traded in the ‘wrong’ account, as per new rules coming into effect from August 1.In a widely-prevalent, but secretly operated practice, the people looking to evade taxes approach certain brokers to show losses in their stock trading accounts, so that their earnings from other sources are not taxed. These brokers are also approached by people looking to show their black money as earnings made through stock market. In exchange for a commission, generally 5-10% of the total amount, these brokers show desired profits or losses in the accounts of their clients after transferring trades from other accounts, created for such purposes only.The brokers generally keep conducting both ‘buy’ and ‘sell’ trades in these fictitious accounts so that they can be used accordingly when approached by such clients.In the market parlance, these deals are known as profit or loss shopping. While profit is purchased to show black money as earnings from the market, the losses are purchased to avoid tax on earnings from other sources.As the transfer of trades is not allowed from one account to the other in general cases, the brokers show the trades conducted in their own fictitious accounts as ‘punching’ errors. The regulations allow transfer of trades in the cases of genuine errors, as at times ‘punching’ or placing of orders can be made for a wrong client. To check any abuse of this rule, SEBI has asked the bourses to put in place a robust mechanism to identify whether the errors are genuine or not. At the same time, the bourses have been asked to levy penalty on the brokers transferring their non-institutional trades from one account to the other. The penalty would be 1% of the traded value in wrong account, if such trades are up to 5% of the broker’s total non-institutional turnover in a month. The penalty would be 2% of trade value in wrong account, if such transactions exceed 5% of total monthly turnover in a month.Q. What is a ‘punching error as per the passage?

With an aim to check flow of black money and evasion of taxes through stock market, market regulator SEBI has decided to impose hefty penalty on brokers facilitating such transactions from tomorrow. The regulator recently came across a loophole in its existing regulations, which was being abused by stock brokers for facilitating tax evasion and flow of black money through fictitious trades in lieu of hefty commissions. To remove this anomaly, SEBI has asked stock exchanges to penalise the brokers transferring trades from one trading account to another after terming them as ‘punching’ errors. The penalty could be as high as 2% of the value of shares traded in the ‘wrong’ account, as per new rules coming into effect from August 1.In a widely-prevalent, but secretly operated practice, the people looking to evade taxes approach certain brokers to show losses in their stock trading accounts, so that their earnings from other sources are not taxed. These brokers are also approached by people looking to show their black money as earnings made through stock market. In exchange for a commission, generally 5-10% of the total amount, these brokers show desired profits or losses in the accounts of their clients after transferring trades from other accounts, created for such purposes only.The brokers generally keep conducting both ‘buy’ and ‘sell’ trades in these fictitious accounts so that they can be used accordingly when approached by such clients.In the market parlance, these deals are known as profit or loss shopping. While profit is purchased to show black money as earnings from the market, the losses are purchased to avoid tax on earnings from other sources.As the transfer of trades is not allowed from one account to the other in general cases, the brokers show the trades conducted in their own fictitious accounts as ‘punching’ errors. The regulations allow transfer of trades in the cases of genuine errors, as at times ‘punching’ or placing of orders can be made for a wrong client. To check any abuse of this rule, SEBI has asked the bourses to put in place a robust mechanism to identify whether the errors are genuine or not. At the same time, the bourses have been asked to levy penalty on the brokers transferring their non-institutional trades from one account to the other. The penalty would be 1% of the traded value in wrong account, if such trades are up to 5% of the broker’s total non-institutional turnover in a month. The penalty would be 2% of trade value in wrong account, if such transactions exceed 5% of total monthly turnover in a month.Q. What does the word facilitating as used in the passage mean?

What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What was distinctive (special) about Eco's academic writing style?a)His realistic narrative style with trial and errorsb)his interrogative stylec)his monotonous unrealistic styled)fictitious imaginative styleCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev