Introduction:
The question asks why the author's work did not appear at Gemini. The correct answer is option A, which states that it was because of no direct relation to filmmaking. Let's explore this answer in detail.

Explanation:
- Gemini is a platform or venue that is likely related to filmmaking.
- The author's work did not appear at Gemini because it did not have a direct relation to filmmaking. This means that the content or nature of the author's work did not align with the themes, topics, or requirements of Gemini.
- Gemini may be a film festival, a production company, a distributor, or any other entity directly involved in the filmmaking industry. As such, they are likely to have specific criteria or preferences for the works they feature or promote.
- If the author's work falls outside the scope of filmmaking, it would not be suitable or relevant for Gemini. It may belong to a different genre, medium, or field altogether.
- For example, if the author's work is a novel, a painting, a scientific research paper, or any other form of creative or academic work that is not directly related to filmmaking, it would not be considered for inclusion or presentation at Gemini.
- It is important for artists, authors, and creators to align their work with the specific requirements and interests of the platforms or venues they are targeting. This increases the likelihood of their work being recognized, appreciated, and showcased in the appropriate context.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option A because the lack of direct relation to filmmaking is the reason why the author's work did not appear at Gemini.

Conclusion:
The author's work did not appear at Gemini because it did not have a direct relation to filmmaking. It is important for artists to match their work with the specific requirements and interests of the platforms or venues they are targeting.