Railways Exam  >  Railways Questions  >   In the question below, there are few stateme... Start Learning for Free
In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
All horses are rivers.
All rivers are jungles.
No Jungle is flower.
Conclusions:
I. No horse is flower.
II. No flower is horse.
  • a)
    If only Conclusion I follows.
  • b)
    If only Conclusion II follows.
  • c)
    If either Conclusion I or II follows.
  • d)
    If both Conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
In the question below, there are few statements followed by few concl...
If both Conclusions I and II follow.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
In the question below, there are few statements followed by few concl...
Understanding the Statements
The statements provided are:
- All horses are rivers.
- All rivers are jungles.
- No jungle is a flower.
These statements set up a clear relationship between horses, rivers, jungles, and flowers.
Analyzing the Conclusions
Now, let's examine the conclusions one by one:
- Conclusion I: No horse is a flower.
- Conclusion II: No flower is a horse.
Both conclusions stem from the relationships established in the statements.
Logical Deductions
1. From Statements to Conclusion I:
- Since all horses are rivers, and all rivers are jungles, it follows that all horses are also jungles.
- Given that no jungle is a flower, it can be deduced that no horse (which is a river and thus a jungle) can be a flower.
- Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
2. From Statements to Conclusion II:
- Conclusion II essentially states the same relationship from a different perspective.
- If no jungle is a flower, and all horses are jungles, then it logically follows that flowers cannot be horses.
- Thus, Conclusion II also follows.
Final Decision
Since both conclusions logically follow from the given statements, we conclude that:
- Both Conclusions I and II are valid.
Hence, the correct answer is option 'D'.
Summary
- All horses are riversAll rivers are junglesNo jungle is a flower.
- Conclusion I: No horse is a flower (True).
- Conclusion II: No flower is a horse (True).
- Final Answer: Option D (Both conclusions follow).
Explore Courses for Railways exam

Similar Railways Doubts

In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Railways. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Railways Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the question below, there are few statements followed by few conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements.Statements:All horses are rivers.All rivers are jungles.No Jungle is flower.Conclusions:I. No horse is flower.II. No flower is horse.a)If only Conclusion I follows.b)If only Conclusion II follows.c)If either Conclusion I or II follows.d)If both Conclusions I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Railways tests.
Explore Courses for Railways exam

Top Courses for Railways

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev