Directions: In the following questions, a statement of assertion (A) i...
Eliminating subsidies can indeed go against the goal of equity because it would likely increase the disparity between rich and poor farmers. Subsidies often help to level the playing field by providing financial support to those who may not have sufficient resources. Removing these subsidies can disproportionately affect poor farmers, widening the economic gap between them and richer farmers.
View all questions of this test
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of assertion (A) i...
Assertion (A) and Reason (R)
Assertion (A): Eliminating subsidies goes against the goal of Equity.
Reason (R): It will increase the disparity between rich and poor farmers.
Explanation:
- The statement of assertion claims that eliminating subsidies goes against the goal of equity.
- The statement of reason states that eliminating subsidies will increase the disparity between rich and poor farmers.
- Let's analyze these statements in detail to determine their correctness and the relationship between them.
Understanding Assertion (A)
- Equity refers to fairness and justice in the distribution of resources. It aims to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities and access to resources.
- Subsidies are financial support given by the government to certain sectors, including agriculture, to promote their growth and development.
- Eliminating subsidies in the agricultural sector can lead to an uneven playing field, where farmers without subsidies may struggle to compete with those who still receive financial support.
- This can result in a lack of equity, as farmers without subsidies may face disadvantages in terms of resources, technology, and market access.
Understanding Reason (R)
- The reason provided for the assertion is that eliminating subsidies will increase the disparity between rich and poor farmers.
- Subsidies are often given to farmers based on their landholding size or production capacity.
- Rich farmers may have larger landholdings and higher production capacity, which makes them more likely to receive larger subsidies.
- By eliminating subsidies, the financial support that rich farmers receive will be taken away, reducing the disparity between them and poor farmers.
- As a result, the gap between rich and poor farmers may widen, leading to increased inequality and disparity in the agricultural sector.
Conclusion
- Both the assertion and reason are true in this case.
- The reason provided is a correct explanation for the assertion.
- Eliminating subsidies can indeed go against the goal of equity by increasing the disparity between rich and poor farmers.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A': Both assertion (A) and reason (R) are true, and reason (R) is the correct explanation of assertion (A).
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Commerce study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Commerce.