All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless,... Start Learning for Free
An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).
  • a)
    The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.
  • b)
    The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.
  • c)
    Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.
  • d)
    Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one th...
This paragraph tells us that the ignorant mind is filled with a clutter of misleading theories and facts. The clutter is a by-product of our ability, as a species, to recognize patterns and theorize based on these. But this very same genius for storytelling, along with our inability to recognize our own ignorance, can put us in undesirable situations.
Option B captures all the key ideas of the paragraph: (a) our mental clutter- a by-product of our storytelling ability, (b) our ignorance of our own ignorance, and (c) how this can hamper our judgement, leading us to undesirable situations.
Option A states that ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is the "greatest weakness? of our species. The paragraph given does not say this. Also, this option does not touch upon our inability to detect our own ignorance, which is an important point made in the paragraph. Not only do we formulate theories out of irrelevant or misleading information, we are ignorant of this.
Option C states that our ignorance is "compounded" by our tendency to create stories out of the clutter in our minds. What the paragraph states is different. The paragraph states that our tendency to recognize patterns and tell stories based on these creates mental clutter. Also, option C does not talk of our inability to detect our own ignorance.
Option D states that our tendency to weave stories out of the mental clutter "often" leads to truly dangerous situations. This overemphasizes the point. The paragraph only mentions that our creative storytelling ability and ignorance of our own ignorance can "sometimes" lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous. Further, this option too does not mention our inability to detect our own ignorance.
The question is "Choose the option that summarizes the paragraph best "
Hence, the answer is B
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one th...
Explanation:

Clutter in our minds:
The passage highlights how our minds can become cluttered with irrelevant or misleading information due to our innate ability to recognize patterns and formulate theories. This clutter can hinder our judgment and decision-making processes.

Inability to perceive ignorance:
Another key point made in the passage is our inability to detect our own ignorance. This lack of self-awareness can lead us to believe in inaccurate information and theories, further contributing to the clutter in our minds.

Impact on judgment:
The combination of cluttered minds and ignorance can have detrimental effects on our judgment. It can lead us to make embarrassing, unfortunate, or even dangerous decisions, especially in complex societies where mistaken beliefs can have significant consequences.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the passage emphasizes how the clutter in our minds, stemming from our storytelling ability and lack of self-awareness about our ignorance, can impede our judgment and decision-making processes. It serves as a cautionary reminder to be mindful of the information we store in our minds and to constantly challenge our beliefs to ensure they are based on accurate and relevant knowledge.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

In the late 1940s, a graduate student at the University of Chicago named Clair Patterson was using a new method of lead isotope measurement to try to get a definitive age for the Earth. Unfortunately all his samples came up contaminated usually wildly so. Most contained something like two hundred times the levels of lead that would normally be expected to occur. Many years would pass before Patterson realized that the reason for this lay with a regrettable inventor named Thomas Midgley, Jr.Midgley was an engineer by training, and the world would no doubt have been a safer place if he had stayed so. Instead, he developed an interest in the industrial applications of chemistry. In 1921, while working for the General Motors Research Corporation in Dayton, Ohio, he investigated a compound called tetraethyl lead (also known, confusingly, as lead tetraethyl), and discovered that it significantly reduced the juddering condition known as engine knock.Even though lead was widely known to be dangerous, by the early years of the twentieth century it could be found in all manner of consumer products.Food came in cans sealed with lead solder. Water was often stored in lead- lined tanks. It was sprayed onto fruit as a pesticide in the form of lead arsenate. It even came as part of the packaging of toothpaste tubes. Hardly a product existed that didnt bring a little lead into consumers lives. However, nothing gave it a greater and more lasting intimacy than its addition to gasoline.Lead is a neurotoxin. Get too much of it and you can irreparably damage the brain and central nervous system. Among the many symptoms associated with overexposure are blindness, insomnia, kidney failure, hearing loss, cancer, palsies and convulsions. In its most acute form it produces abrupt and terrifying hallucinations, disturbing to victims and onlookers alike, which generally then give way to coma and death. You really dont want to get too much lead into your system.On the other hand, lead was easy to extract and work, and almost embarrassingly profitable to produce industrially and tetraethyl lead did indubitably stop engines from knocking. So in 1923 three of Americas largest corporations, General Motors, Du Pont and Standard Oil of New Jersey, formed a joint enterprise called the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation (later shortened to simply Ethyl Corporation) with a view to making as much tetraethyl lead as the world was willing to buy, and that proved to be a very great deal. They called their additive ethyl because it sounded friendlier and less toxic than lead and introduced it for public consumption (in more ways than most people realize d) on February 1, 1923.Almost at once production workers began to exhibit the staggered gait and confused faculties that mark the recently poisoned. Also almost at once, theEthyl Corporation embarked on a policy of calm but unyielding denial that would serve it well for decades. As Sharon Bertsch McGrayne notes in her absorbing history of industrial chemistry, Prometheans in the Lab, when employees at one plant developed irreversible delusions, a spokesman blandly informed reporters: These men probably went insane because they worked too hard. Altogether at least fifteen workers died in the early days of production of leaded gasoline, and untold numbers of others became ill, often violently so; the exact numbers are unknown because the company nearly always managed to hush up news of embarrassing leakages, spills and poisonings. At times, however, suppressing the news became impossible, most notably in 1924 when in a matter of days five production workers died and thirty-five more were turned into permanent staggering wrecks at a single ill-ventilated facility.As rumours circulated about the dangers of the new product, ethyls ebullient inventor, Thomas Midgley, decided to hold a demonstration for reporters to allay their concerns. As he chatted away about the companys commitment to safety, he poured tetraethyl lead over his hands, then held a beaker of it to his nose for sixty seconds, claiming all the while that he could repeat the procedure daily without harm. In fact, Midgley knew only too well the perils of lead poisoning: he had himself been made seriously ill from overexposure a few months earlier and now, except when reassuring journalists, never went near the stuff if he could help it.Q. What is the author s opinion of the use of tetraethyl lead in gasoline?

Group QuestionThe passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The problem of induction may also be formulated as the question of the validity or the truth of universal statements which are based on experience, such as the hypotheses and theoretical systems of the empirical sciences. For many people believe that the truth of these universal statements is known by experience; yet it is clear that an account of an experience-of an observation or the result of an experiment-can in the first place be only a singular statement and not a universal one. Accordingly, people who say of a universal statement that we know its truth from experience usually mean that the truth of this universal statement can somehow be reduced to the truth of singular ones, and that these singular ones are known by experience to be true; which amounts to saying that the universal statement is based on inductive inference. Thus, to ask whether there are natural laws known to be true appears to be only another way of asking whether inductive inferences are logically justified.Yet if we want to find a way of justifying inductive inferences, we must first of all try to establish a principle of induction. A principle of induction would be a statement with the help of which we could put inductive inferences into a logically acceptable form. In the eyes of the upholders of inductive logic, a principle of induction is of supreme importance for scientific method. This principle, says Reichenbach, determines the truth of scientific theories. To eliminate it from science would mean nothing less than to deprive science of the power todecide the truth or falsity of its theories. Without it, clearly, science would no longer have the right to distinguish its theories from the fanciful and arbitrary creations of the poets mind.Q.According to the passage, the problem of induction is least likely to stem from which of the following?

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.There are 6 workers - Biju, Babloo, Babya, Birju, Billy and Billu - who get paid different salaries according to their amount of work experience.i. Biju is not paid the highest salary while Birju is not the most experienced.ii. The least experienced person is also paid the least among the workers.iii. Billu has more experience than Babloo, who is paid more than Babya.iv. Biju is paid more than Babloo but is less experienced than Babloo.v. Babya is more experienced than Babloo but less than Billu and Birju.vi. Billu is paid less than Babya but more than Billy.vii. Babya has more experience than Biju.viii. Birju is the highest paid amongst the workers.Q.Starting from the least experienced person, what is the position of Babloo?salary-wise?

Directions : Study the given paragraph carefully to answer the following questions.Out of 2500 candidates eligible for an Assistant Professor post in a top-rated university, 120 candidates have prior experience of working in other universities, 15% have experience of working in colleges, 32% of them have post doctorate degrees, 65% of them have doctorate degrees, 20% of them are pursuing PHD and rest are only post graduates(not pursuing PHD). Among the candidates who have prior experiences with colleges 72 of them have post doctorate degree and 60% have doctorate degrees and the rest are pursuing PHD. Among the candidates who have experiences of working in universities 45% are post doctorates and rest are doctorates. The minimum qualification needed to be an assistant professor is post graduate degree.Find the number of candidates who are only post graduates but have the experience of working in a college.

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).a)The ability to recognize patterns and creatively formulate theories is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of our species.b)The clutter in our minds that stems from our storytelling ability, along with our inability to perceive our own ignorance, hampers our judgement.c)Our ignorance is compounded by our tendency to create stories around inaccurate, irrelevant and misleading information that clutters our minds.d)Our tendency to weave theories out of the clutter of information stored in our minds can often lead us to truly dangerous situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup