Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > Which of the following languages were spoken ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?

a)
Malayalam and Telugu
b)
Kannada and Telugu
c)
Tamil and Telugu
d)
Sanskrit and Telugu

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: History: CBSE Sample Question Paper (2021-22)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in t...

Vijayanagara literature was produced in the Vijayanagara Empire during the golden age of literature in South India in general. The rulers patronised Kannada, Telugu, Sanskrit and Tamil scholars who wrote in the Jain, Virashaiva and Vaishnava traditions.
Languages spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar Empire were Kannada and Telugu.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in t...

Language Spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar Empire

Introduction:
The Vijayanagar Empire, also known as the Kingdom of Vijayanagara, was a powerful South Indian empire that existed from 1336 to 1646. The empire was known for its rich culture, art, and architecture. It encompassed a vast region in South India and had a diverse population speaking different languages. Among the languages spoken by the people of the Vijayanagar Empire, the most prominent ones were Kannada and Telugu.

Languages Spoken:
The Rayas and Nayakas, who were the rulers and governors of the Vijayanagar Empire, predominantly spoke Kannada and Telugu. These were the official languages of the empire and were widely used in administration, court proceedings, and communication with the people.

Kannada:
Kannada is a Dravidian language spoken in the state of Karnataka. It has a rich literary tradition and was the language of choice for the Vijayanagar rulers. Many inscriptions, documents, and literary works of the Vijayanagar period were written in Kannada. The rulers patronized Kannada literature, and Kannada poets and scholars flourished during this time.

Telugu:
Telugu, another Dravidian language, was also widely spoken in the Vijayanagar Empire. It was primarily spoken in the Telugu-speaking regions of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The Nayakas, who were the governors of various provinces within the empire, belonged to the Telugu-speaking regions and used Telugu as their primary language of administration.

Other Languages:
While Kannada and Telugu were the primary languages spoken by the Rayas and Nayakas, it is important to note that the Vijayanagar Empire was a multilingual and multicultural empire. Apart from Kannada and Telugu, other languages like Tamil, Malayalam, and Sanskrit were also spoken by various communities within the empire. However, the official language of the empire remained Kannada and Telugu.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Rayas and Nayakas of the Vijayanagar Empire primarily spoke Kannada and Telugu. These languages were widely used in administration, court proceedings, and communication with the people. While other languages like Tamil, Malayalam, and Sanskrit were also spoken within the empire, Kannada and Telugu held a prominent position in the linguistic landscape of the Vijayanagar Empire.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Name the languages in which the Ashokan inscriptions were written.

View answer

In which languages has Kamala Das written stories and novels?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Why has the method, by which we may master any subject, not been applied to language?

View answer

Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following languages were spoken by Rayas and Nayakas in the Vijayanagar empire?a)Malayalam and Telugub)Kannada and Teluguc)Tamil and Telugud)Sanskrit and TeluguCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam