Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit lang...

Join the Discussion on the App

Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?

a)
Northwest of India
b)
Northeast of India
c)
South western part of India
d)
Eastern part of India

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: History: CBSE Sample Question Paper (2021-22)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them ...

The Aramaic and Greek scripts were used for inscriptions in Afghanistan Northwest of India.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

Name the languages in which the Ashokan inscriptions were written.

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Identify the direction in which a thin long piece of magnet comes to rest when suspended freely.

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Why has the method, by which we may master any subject, not been applied to language?

View answer

Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Most Asokan inscriptions were in Prakrit language, while some of them were in Aramaic and Greek. In which part of India, Aramaic and Greek inscriptions were found?a)Northwest of Indiab)Northeast of Indiac)South western part of Indiad)Eastern part of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam