The vedic philosophy was rejected by the ganas or sanghas because:a)it...
Understanding the Rejection of Vedic Philosophy by Ganas or Sanghas
The rejection of Vedic philosophy by the ganas or sanghas was primarily rooted in its social structure and implications.
Class Division
- The Vedic philosophy inherently divides society into four distinct classes, known as varnas:
- Brahmins (priests and scholars)
- Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers)
- Vaishyas (traders and agriculturists)
- Shudras (servants and laborers)
Social Inequality
- This classification promotes a hierarchical social order, leading to systemic inequality.
- It creates a rigid structure where individuals are born into their roles, limiting social mobility and reinforcing class-based privileges.
Impact on Society
- The ganas or sanghas, which were more egalitarian in nature, opposed this stratification as it contradicted their ideals of collective governance and equality.
- They valued a more inclusive society that encouraged participation from all classes, rejecting any philosophical framework that perpetuated division.
Cultural and Philosophical Alternatives
- The rejection of Vedic philosophy also opened avenues for alternative philosophies, such as Buddhism and Jainism, which embraced more egalitarian principles and emphasized individual spiritual growth without the constraints of caste.
Conclusion
- In summary, the ganas or sanghas rejected Vedic philosophy primarily because it divided society into rigid classes, which contradicted their vision of a more unified and egalitarian social structure. This fundamental disagreement shaped the philosophical landscape of ancient India, leading to diverse pathways in social and spiritual thought.
The vedic philosophy was rejected by the ganas or sanghas because:a)it...
According to the vedic philosophy, the whole society was divided into four distinct classes such as Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra.