CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Direction: In making decisions about importa... Start Learning for Free
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.
Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?
I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.
II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.
  • a)
    if only argument I is strong.
  • b)
    if only argument II is strong.
  • c)
    if either arguments I or II is strong.
  • d)
    if neither argument I nor II is strong.
  • e)
    if both arguments I and II are strong.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desir...
Increased longevity does not mean increased productivity. Hence argument I is weak New recruits are useful to organizations in bringing new innovations. Hence argument II is also weak
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Question: Analyse the following passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow.Formation of focal brand expectations is a well-accepted part of the pre-purchase choice process. However, whether these same expectations are the standard for post-choice performance evaluation has been questioned. There is very little theoretical justification for consumers using focal brand expectations to judge performance after purchase. Customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction is more likely to be determined by how well a consumer perceives that focal brand performance fulfils needs, wants, or desires.Importantly, there is no necessary relationship between prepurchase focal brand expectations and the performance required to meet those wants. Thus, consumers are very likely to use other kinds of performance standards in the post-purchase evaluation. Consumers are likely to rely on standards that reflect the performance a consumer believes a focal brand should provide to meet needs/wants. To distinguish these standards from the usual expectations concept, we call them "experience-based norms." These norms have two important characteristics: (1) they reflect desired performance in meeting needs/wants and (2) they are constrained by the performance consumers believe is possible as indicated by the performance of known brands. The second characteristic requires elaboration. Though consumers may imagine some abstract ideal performance that a brand should provide, they also have concrete experiences with various real brands and their performance. Because consumers are more likely to think in concrete rather than abstract terms, experience with real brands should set limits on the performance a consumer believes the focal brand should provide. Consumers may derive a norm from experience with known brands in at least two different ways. First, the norm might be the typical performance of a particular brand - e.g., a consumer's most preferred brand, a popular brand, or last-purchased brand.Importantly, this brand may not be the focal brand. For example, when evaluating the dining experience in a new restaurant, a consumer may apply a norm that is the typical performance of another, favourite restaurant. Interestingly, focal brand expectations may correspond to this norm, but only if the focal brand is also the brand from which the standard is derived, such as when a consumer dines in his or her favourite restaurant. In all other cases, the norm is necessarily different from expectations because the norm is derived from experience with a different brand. A second possibility is that the norm might be an average performance a consumer believes is typical of a group of similar brands — a product-based norm. This kind of norm may be reasonable when no one brand stands out in the consumer's mind and the consumer has experience with many brands. In general, the experience-based norms concept is significant because it suggests that past research may have attached unwarranted importance to focal brand expectations as the standard of performance influencing feelings of satisfaction.Given below are statements that attempt to capture the central idea of this passage:1. Satisfaction pertains to performance and not to expectations.2. In-order to perform well, a focal brand should fulfil consumer needs rather than match their expectations.3. Brand performance standards are determined by consumer experiences of products.Which of the following statement(s) best captures the central idea.

Question: Analyse the following passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow.Formation of focal brand expectations is a well-accepted part of the pre-purchase choice process. However, whether these same expectations are the standard for post-choice performance evaluation has been questioned. There is very little theoretical justification for consumers using focal brand expectations to judge performance after purchase. Customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction is more likely to be determined by how well a consumer perceives that focal brand performance fulfils needs, wants, or desires.Importantly, there is no necessary relationship between prepurchase focal brand expectations and the performance required to meet those wants. Thus, consumers are very likely to use other kinds of performance standards in the post-purchase evaluation. Consumers are likely to rely on standards that reflect the performance a consumer believes a focal brand should provide to meet needs/wants. To distinguish these standards from the usual expectations concept, we call them "experience-based norms." These norms have two important characteristics: (1) they reflect desired performance in meeting needs/wants and (2) they are constrained by the performance consumers believe is possible as indicated by the performance of known brands. The second characteristic requires elaboration. Though consumers may imagine some abstract ideal performance that a brand should provide, they also have concrete experiences with various real brands and their performance. Because consumers are more likely to think in concrete rather than abstract terms, experience with real brands should set limits on the performance a consumer believes the focal brand should provide. Consumers may derive a norm from experience with known brands in at least two different ways. First, the norm might be the typical performance of a particular brand - e.g., a consumer's most preferred brand, a popular brand, or last-purchased brand.Importantly, this brand may not be the focal brand. For example, when evaluating the dining experience in a new restaurant, a consumer may apply a norm that is the typical performance of another, favourite restaurant. Interestingly, focal brand expectations may correspond to this norm, but only if the focal brand is also the brand from which the standard is derived, such as when a consumer dines in his or her favourite restaurant. In all other cases, the norm is necessarily different from expectations because the norm is derived from experience with a different brand. A second possibility is that the norm might be an average performance a consumer believes is typical of a group of similar brands — a product-based norm. This kind of norm may be reasonable when no one brand stands out in the consumer's mind and the consumer has experience with many brands. In general, the experience-based norms concept is significant because it suggests that past research may have attached unwarranted importance to focal brand expectations as the standard of performance influencing feelings of satisfaction.Which of the following statements, if true, would contradict the second characteristic of “experience-based norms”?

Question: Analyse the following passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow.Formation of focal brand expectations is a well-accepted part of the pre-purchase choice process. However, whether these same expectations are the standard for post-choice performance evaluation has been questioned. There is very little theoretical justification for consumers using focal brand expectations to judge performance after purchase. Customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction is more likely to be determined by how well a consumer perceives that focal brand performance fulfils needs, wants, or desires.Importantly, there is no necessary relationship between prepurchase focal brand expectations and the performance required to meet those wants. Thus, consumers are very likely to use other kinds of performance standards in the post-purchase evaluation. Consumers are likely to rely on standards that reflect the performance a consumer believes a focal brand should provide to meet needs/wants. To distinguish these standards from the usual expectations concept, we call them "experience-based norms." These norms have two important characteristics: (1) they reflect desired performance in meeting needs/wants and (2) they are constrained by the performance consumers believe is possible as indicated by the performance of known brands. The second characteristic requires elaboration. Though consumers may imagine some abstract ideal performance that a brand should provide, they also have concrete experiences with various real brands and their performance. Because consumers are more likely to think in concrete rather than abstract terms, experience with real brands should set limits on the performance a consumer believes the focal brand should provide. Consumers may derive a norm from experience with known brands in at least two different ways. First, the norm might be the typical performance of a particular brand - e.g., a consumer's most preferred brand, a popular brand, or last-purchased brand.Importantly, this brand may not be the focal brand. For example, when evaluating the dining experience in a new restaurant, a consumer may apply a norm that is the typical performance of another, favourite restaurant. Interestingly, focal brand expectations may correspond to this norm, but only if the focal brand is also the brand from which the standard is derived, such as when a consumer dines in his or her favourite restaurant. In all other cases, the norm is necessarily different from expectations because the norm is derived from experience with a different brand. A second possibility is that the norm might be an average performance a consumer believes is typical of a group of similar brands — a product-based norm. This kind of norm may be reasonable when no one brand stands out in the consumer's mind and the consumer has experience with many brands. In general, the experience-based norms concept is significant because it suggests that past research may have attached unwarranted importance to focal brand expectations as the standard of performance influencing feelings of satisfaction.The statement, “there is no necessary relationship between pre-purchase focal brand expectations and the performance required to meet those wants” implies that

Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if either arguments I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev