Question Description
The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progressed in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 become literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.e)The rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006 was due to persistent campaign on television and FM radio.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.