TANWA project initiated ina)Keralab)Andhra Pradeshc)Tamil Nadud)MaharashtraCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > TANWA project initiated ina)Keralab)Andhra Pr...

TANWA project initiated in

a)
Kerala
b)
Andhra Pradesh
c)
Tamil Nadu
d)
Maharashtra

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

TANWA project initiated ina)Keralab)Andhra Pradeshc)Tamil Nadud)Mahara...

Tamil Nadu Women in Agriculture (TANWA) was a project initiated in the late 1980s in Tamil Nadu to train women in latest agricultural techniques and in organic farming. It encouraged women to actively participate in raising agricultural productivity and family income.

Free Test

FREE

Sociology: CUET Mock Test - 2
40 Ques | 45 Min

Start Free Test

View all free Class 12 tests

Community Answer

TANWA project initiated ina)Keralab)Andhra Pradeshc)Tamil Nadud)Mahara...

The correct answer is option 'C' - Tamil Nadu.

TANWA (Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board) is a project initiated in Tamil Nadu. It focuses on providing water supply and drainage facilities to the people of the state.

Here is a detailed explanation of the TANWA project:

Introduction:
Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TANWA) is a government agency responsible for planning, implementing, and maintaining water supply and drainage systems in Tamil Nadu. The board was established to address the growing demand for clean water and efficient drainage systems in the state.

Objectives:
The primary objective of the TANWA project is to ensure access to safe and clean drinking water for all residents of Tamil Nadu. The project also aims to improve the existing drainage infrastructure in order to prevent waterlogging and flooding in urban areas.

Key Initiatives:
TANWA has undertaken several key initiatives to achieve its objectives. Some of these initiatives include:

1. Water Supply Projects: TANWA has implemented various water supply projects to provide clean and safe drinking water to both urban and rural areas. These projects involve the construction of reservoirs, water treatment plants, and distribution networks to ensure a reliable supply of water.

2. Rainwater Harvesting: In order to conserve water and recharge groundwater levels, TANWA promotes rainwater harvesting techniques. It encourages the installation of rainwater harvesting structures in residential, commercial, and institutional buildings.

3. Sewerage and Drainage Systems: TANWA is responsible for the construction and maintenance of sewerage and drainage systems in Tamil Nadu. It focuses on improving the existing infrastructure to prevent water stagnation, waterlogging, and flooding in urban areas.

4. Water Quality Monitoring: TANWA regularly monitors the quality of water supplied to ensure that it meets the required standards. It conducts tests and analysis to identify any contamination and takes appropriate measures to address it.

5. Public Awareness and Participation: TANWA actively engages with the public through awareness campaigns and community participation programs. It educates people about water conservation, hygiene practices, and the importance of maintaining a clean environment.

Benefits:
The TANWA project has several benefits for the people of Tamil Nadu. Some of the key benefits include:

1. Improved Access to Clean Water: The project ensures that every household has access to clean and safe drinking water, thereby improving public health and hygiene.

2. Reduced Waterborne Diseases: By providing clean water and improving sanitation facilities, the project helps in reducing waterborne diseases and improving the overall health of the population.

3. Enhanced Drainage Systems: The project aims to improve the drainage infrastructure, which helps in preventing water stagnation and flooding in urban areas.

4. Conservation of Water Resources: TANWA promotes rainwater harvesting techniques, which helps in conserving water resources and recharging groundwater levels.

5. Sustainable Development: The project's focus on public awareness and community participation promotes sustainable development practices and encourages people to actively participate in the conservation of water resources.

In conclusion, the TANWA project is a significant initiative undertaken by the Tamil Nadu government to provide clean water supply and efficient drainage facilities to the residents of the state. Through various initiatives and public participation, the project aims to ensure sustainable development and improve the overall quality of life for the people of Tamil Nadu.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. As used in the passage, the word "sluggish" most nearly means

View answer

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. The passage puts forth its points using which of the following?

View answer

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. Which of the following reason have been cited in the passage for the better performance of the Southern States?

View answer

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. Which of the following choices best captures the essence of the passage?