Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)...

Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.

a)
Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.
b)
Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.
c)
Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.
d)
Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she ...

Explanation:

The correct answer is option A: "Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo."

Let's break down the sentence and analyze each part:

Subject: Kavita
Verb: has said

The verb "said" indicates that Kavita expressed something. The past tense of "say" is "said."

Direct Quote: "I have gone to the zoo."

The direct quote states that Kavita has gone to the zoo. In the direct quote, the pronoun "I" is used, which refers to the speaker, Kavita. However, when reporting someone else's statement, we need to change the pronoun to match the subject of the reporting clause, which is Kavita. Therefore, "I" changes to "she" in the reported speech.

Now, let's analyze the options one by one:

a) Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.
This option correctly uses the reporting clause "that she has gone," which is the correct way to report the direct quote. Additionally, it uses the correct subject pronoun "she" to match the subject of the reporting clause.

b) Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.
The verb "have" is incorrect because it does not agree with the subject "Kavita." The correct form for the subject "Kavita" is "has."

c) Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.
The word "told" is not the appropriate verb to use in this context. When reporting someone's words, we generally use "said" instead of "told."

d) Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.
Similar to option b, this option uses the incorrect verb form "have" instead of "has" to agree with the subject "Kavita."

Therefore, the correct answer is option A: "Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo."

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Change Of Speech- 1
10 Ques | 10 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CAT tests

Community Answer

Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she ...

Reporting verb 'has said' is in present tense, so tense in reported speech doesn't change. Pronoun 'I' changes to 'she'
In option B tense is changed. So, it is incorrect.
In option C tense of reporting verb is changed. So, it is incorrect.
In option D tense is changed. So, it is incorrect.

hence, the correct option is A

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

A King once had a lake made in the courtyard for the young princes to play in. They swam about in it, and sailed their boats and rafts on it. One day the king told them he had asked the men to put some fishes into the lake. Off the boys ran to see the fishes. Now, along with the fishes, there was a Turtle. The boys were delighted with the fishes, but they had never seen a Turtle, and they were afraid of it, thinking it was a demon. They ran back to their father, crying, There is a demon on the bank of the lake. The king ordered his men to catch the demon, and to bring it to the palace. When the Turtle was brought in, the boys cried and ran away. The king always liked turtles but was also very fond of his sons, so he ordered the men who had brought the Turtle to kill it. How shall we kill it? they asked. Pound it to powder, said someone. Bake it in hot coals, said another. So one plan after another was spoken of. Then an old man who had always been afraid of the water said: Throw the thing into the lake where it flows out over the rocks into the river. Then it will surely be killed. When the Turtle heard what the old man said, he thrust out his head and asked: Friend, what have I done that you should do such a dreadful thing as that to me? The other plans were bad enough, but to throw me into the lake! Dont speak of such a cruel thing! When the king heard what the Turtle said, he told his men to take the Turtle at once and throw it into the lake. The Turtle laughed to himself as he slid away down the river to his old home.Q. If you were the king, what would you have done with the turtle, once you found out that your sons were afraid of it?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:The silent treatment goes by many names: shunning, social isolation, stonewalling, ghosting. Although psychologists have nuanced definitions for each term, they are all essentially forms of ostracism. And the tactic is nothing new. Ancient Greeks expelled for 10 years citizens who were thought to be a threat to democracy, and early American settlers banished people accused of practising witchcraft.“My research suggests that two in three individuals have used the silent treatment against someone else; even more have had it done to them,” Williams said. Experts told me that although they need more data to know for certain, instances of the silent treatment have likely increased over the years as new forms of communication have been invented. “Every new method of connection can be used as a form of disconnection,” Williams said.Ostracism can also manifest in lesser ways: someone walking out of the room in the middle of a conversation, a friend at school looking the other way when you wave at them, or a person addressing comments from everyone in a message thread except you. “Partial ostracism,” Williams told me, might mean monosyllabic replies—a terse period at the end of a one-word text message. But in serious cases, ostracism can take a heavy toll whereby victims become anxious, withdrawn, depressed, or even suicidal. “Because we humans require social contact for our mental health, the ramifications of isolation can be severe,” Joel Cooper, a psychology professor at Princeton, told me. “In the short term, the silent treatment causes stress. In the long term, the stress can be considered abuse.”The silent treatment is a particularly insidious form of abuse because it might force the victim to reconcile with the perpetrator in an effort to end the behavior, even if the victim doesn’t know why they’re apologizing. “It’s especially controlling because it deprives both sides from weighing in,” Williams said.The silent treatment might be employed by passive personality types to avoid conflict and confrontation, while strong personality types use it to punish or control. Some people may not even consciously choose it at all. “A person may be flooded with feelings they can’t put into words, so they just shut down,” Anne Fishel, the director of the Family and Couples Therapy Program at Massachusetts General Hospital, told me. But regardless of the reason for the silent treatment, it can be received by victims as ostracism.One study found that social rejection provoked a response in its victims similar to that of victims of physical abuse; the anterior cingulate cortex area of the brain—the area thought to interpret emotion and pain—was active in both instances. “Exclusion and rejection literally hurt,” John Bargh, a psychology professor at Yale, told me.But the silent treatment ultimately harms the person causing it, too. Humans are predisposed to reciprocate social cues, so ignoring someone goes against our nature, Williams said. The perpetrator is therefore forced to justify the behaviour in order to keep doing it; they keep in mind all the reasons they’re choosing to ignore someone. Worse, the silent treatment can become addictive. The father who couldn’t force himself to speak to his son again suffered the way many addicts suffer—through repeating an activity despite knowing its harm. “Most people who start giving the silent treatment never intend for it to go on for as long as it does, but it can be very difficult to stop,” Williams told me. “It’s psychological quicksand.”Q.Why does Williams tag ostracism as " psychological quicksand"?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:The silent treatment goes by many names: shunning, social isolation, stonewalling, ghosting. Although psychologists have nuanced definitions for each term, they are all essentially forms of ostracism. And the tactic is nothing new. Ancient Greeks expelled for 10 years citizens who were thought to be a threat to democracy, and early American settlers banished people accused of practising witchcraft.“My research suggests that two in three individuals have used the silent treatment against someone else; even more have had it done to them,” Williams said. Experts told me that although they need more data to know for certain, instances of the silent treatment have likely increased over the years as new forms of communication have been invented. “Every new method of connection can be used as a form of disconnection,” Williams said.Ostracism can also manifest in lesser ways: someone walking out of the room in the middle of a conversation, a friend at school looking the other way when you wave at them, or a person addressing comments from everyone in a message thread except you. “Partial ostracism,” Williams told me, might mean monosyllabic replies—a terse period at the end of a one-word text message. But in serious cases, ostracism can take a heavy toll whereby victims become anxious, withdrawn, depressed, or even suicidal. “Because we humans require social contact for our mental health, the ramifications of isolation can be severe,” Joel Cooper, a psychology professor at Princeton, told me. “In the short term, the silent treatment causes stress. In the long term, the stress can be considered abuse.”The silent treatment is a particularly insidious form of abuse because it might force the victim to reconcile with the perpetrator in an effort to end the behavior, even if the victim doesn’t know why they’re apologizing. “It’s especially controlling because it deprives both sides from weighing in,” Williams said.The silent treatment might be employed by passive personality types to avoid conflict and confrontation, while strong personality types use it to punish or control. Some people may not even consciously choose it at all. “A person may be flooded with feelings they can’t put into words, so they just shut down,” Anne Fishel, the director of the Family and Couples Therapy Program at Massachusetts General Hospital, told me. But regardless of the reason for the silent treatment, it can be received by victims as ostracism.One study found that social rejection provoked a response in its victims similar to that of victims of physical abuse; the anterior cingulate cortex area of the brain—the area thought to interpret emotion and pain—was active in both instances. “Exclusion and rejection literally hurt,” John Bargh, a psychology professor at Yale, told me.But the silent treatment ultimately harms the person causing it, too. Humans are predisposed to reciprocate social cues, so ignoring someone goes against our nature, Williams said. The perpetrator is therefore forced to justify the behaviour in order to keep doing it; they keep in mind all the reasons they’re choosing to ignore someone. Worse, the silent treatment can become addictive. The father who couldn’t force himself to speak to his son again suffered the way many addicts suffer—through repeating an activity despite knowing its harm. “Most people who start giving the silent treatment never intend for it to go on for as long as it does, but it can be very difficult to stop,” Williams told me. “It’s psychological quicksand.”Q.Which of the following is not true as per the passage?

View answer

A King once had a lake made in the courtyard for the young princes to play in. They swam about in it, and sailed their boats and rafts on it. One day the king told them he had asked the men to put some fishes into the lake. Off the boys ran to see the fishes. Now, along with the fishes, there was a Turtle. The boys were delighted with the fishes, but they had never seen a Turtle, and they were afraid of it, thinking it was a demon. They ran back to their father, crying, There is a demon on the bank of the lake. The king ordered his men to catch the demon, and to bring it to the palace. When the Turtle was brought in, the boys cried and ran away. The king always liked turtles but was also very fond of his sons, so he ordered the men who had brought the Turtle to kill it. How shall we kill it? they asked. Pound it to powder, said someone. Bake it in hot coals, said another. So one plan after another was spoken of. Then an old man who had always been afraid of the water said: Throw the thing into the lake where it flows out over the rocks into the river. Then it will surely be killed. When the Turtle heard what the old man said, he thrust out his head and asked: Friend, what have I done that you should do such a dreadful thing as that to me? The other plans were bad enough, but to throw me into the lake! Dont speak of such a cruel thing! When the king heard what the Turtle said, he told his men to take the Turtle at once and throw it into the lake. The Turtle laughed to himself as he slid away down the river to his old home.Q. What message is the passage trying to convey?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:The silent treatment goes by many names: shunning, social isolation, stonewalling, ghosting. Although psychologists have nuanced definitions for each term, they are all essentially forms of ostracism. And the tactic is nothing new. Ancient Greeks expelled for 10 years citizens who were thought to be a threat to democracy, and early American settlers banished people accused of practising witchcraft.“My research suggests that two in three individuals have used the silent treatment against someone else; even more have had it done to them,” Williams said. Experts told me that although they need more data to know for certain, instances of the silent treatment have likely increased over the years as new forms of communication have been invented. “Every new method of connection can be used as a form of disconnection,” Williams said.Ostracism can also manifest in lesser ways: someone walking out of the room in the middle of a conversation, a friend at school looking the other way when you wave at them, or a person addressing comments from everyone in a message thread except you. “Partial ostracism,” Williams told me, might mean monosyllabic replies—a terse period at the end of a one-word text message. But in serious cases, ostracism can take a heavy toll whereby victims become anxious, withdrawn, depressed, or even suicidal. “Because we humans require social contact for our mental health, the ramifications of isolation can be severe,” Joel Cooper, a psychology professor at Princeton, told me. “In the short term, the silent treatment causes stress. In the long term, the stress can be considered abuse.”The silent treatment is a particularly insidious form of abuse because it might force the victim to reconcile with the perpetrator in an effort to end the behavior, even if the victim doesn’t know why they’re apologizing. “It’s especially controlling because it deprives both sides from weighing in,” Williams said.The silent treatment might be employed by passive personality types to avoid conflict and confrontation, while strong personality types use it to punish or control. Some people may not even consciously choose it at all. “A person may be flooded with feelings they can’t put into words, so they just shut down,” Anne Fishel, the director of the Family and Couples Therapy Program at Massachusetts General Hospital, told me. But regardless of the reason for the silent treatment, it can be received by victims as ostracism.One study found that social rejection provoked a response in its victims similar to that of victims of physical abuse; the anterior cingulate cortex area of the brain—the area thought to interpret emotion and pain—was active in both instances. “Exclusion and rejection literally hurt,” John Bargh, a psychology professor at Yale, told me.But the silent treatment ultimately harms the person causing it, too. Humans are predisposed to reciprocate social cues, so ignoring someone goes against our nature, Williams said. The perpetrator is therefore forced to justify the behaviour in order to keep doing it; they keep in mind all the reasons they’re choosing to ignore someone. Worse, the silent treatment can become addictive. The father who couldn’t force himself to speak to his son again suffered the way many addicts suffer—through repeating an activity despite knowing its harm. “Most people who start giving the silent treatment never intend for it to go on for as long as it does, but it can be very difficult to stop,” Williams told me. “It’s psychological quicksand.”Q.According to the passage, the perpetrators of silent treatment are compelled to justify their behavior because

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Kavita has said, I have gone go to the zoo.a)Kavita has said that she has gone to the zoo.b)Kavita have said that she has gone to the zoo.c)Kavita has told that she has gone to the zoo.d)Kavita has said that she have gone to the zoo.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam