All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: Read the information below and a... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.
In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.
Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?
  • a)
    Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.
  • b)
    Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.
  • c)
    The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.
  • d)
    There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.
  • e)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that f...
Despite the fact that undergraduate students spent less time per month on research work, the time spent by university students overall increased. Therefore, it must be that the graduate students spent more time per month on research work in 2000 as compared to that in 1999. Option C is correct.
Option B cannot be concluded as we do not know how much time the graduate and undergraduate students spent, respectively. The university students might have increased the time, say, from 10 hours to 15 hours, whereas the undergraduate students might have decreased the time, say, from 25 hours to 20 hours.
Other options do not get support from the passage. Only option C can be safely concluded.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that f...
Explanation:

Amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased
- The statement mentions that university students, as a whole, devoted more time to research work in 2000 compared to 1999.
- It also states that undergraduate students spent less time on research work in 2000 than in 1999.
- Therefore, the increase in time spent on research work must have come from graduate students, as they are part of the university student population.
- This conclusion is valid based on the information provided.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C: The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Not for the first time, I watched as one of our PhD students was loaded into an ambulance and taken to hospital. He had collapsed in one of the university research labs about 20 minutes earlier. A few hours later we received word from the hospital that the student was now alert and all tests were normal. Just as I had seen previously, the student had fainted as a result of stress, anxiety and fatigue.This was not what I had in mind when I accepted a position as a non-academic member of staff. Rather than the relaxed conditions I expected, I found myself in the most stressful environment I had ever experienced.I initially assumed this was isolated to my university. However with a little online research, I found these toxic conditions were commonplace in universities the world over. Having been part of the university system for some time, Im now able to see past the imposing architecture and impressive titles.These figures sit uncomfortably next to the professed ideals of these institutions. Our universities claim to exist to provide our most brilliant minds the freedom to nurture their greatest ideas and inspire the next generation.To facilitate this, the organisation provides infrastructure and services. With these resources, hundreds of academics are then free to pursue their goals and further their own positions as quasi-entrepreneurs. Unfortunately, these untethered conditions are also very favourable for those with an unhinged sense of entitlement. It strikes me that a rogue professor can often operate on campus with virtual impunity.Even a well-meaning academic has to juggle many responsibilities. For example, a research professor must teach hundreds of undergraduates, supervise a team of PhD researchers, manage research grants and collaborations and edit publications and dissertations. Very few professors are able to accomplish all this without the overwhelming burden affecting their character and judgement. The resulting stress often manifests as poor judgement and negative behaviour.Unfortunately, the ones most likely to be on the receiving end of this are the PhD students, postdoctoral researchers and non-academic staff, who are often on short employment contracts. These people are in very tenuous positions and have little if any recourse. This situation creates a dynamic where the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour are often blurred.There are also many academics who can only muddle through by riding on the coattails of students. Sadly, students are also vulnerable to the theft of data, ideas and materials; not only by their colleagues, but sometimes by their own supervisor. In a university environment, this type of bad behaviour is unfortunately so frequent, it is too often normalised and ignored.The surprising tolerance of this type of behaviour is likely a result of academia being a product of itself. After all, all academics were once long-suffering PhD students. Hence because of the familiarity, academia often fails to see the gravity of the situation.But the wider community would be shocked to know this behaviour was so prevalent at the very highest level of education. The community expects so much more from people calling themselves doctor or professor. The current model of postgraduate research is severely flawed and should be urgently addressed. If we dont, the vicious circle will continue.Q. What does the author say about the professors attitude towards non-academic staff?

Directions:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Not for the first time, I watched as one of our PhD students was loaded into an ambulance and taken to hospital. He had collapsed in one of the university research labs about 20 minutes earlier. A few hours later we received word from the hospital that the student was now alert and all tests were normal. Just as I had seen previously, the student had fainted as a result of stress, anxiety and fatigue.This was not what I had in mind when I accepted a position as a non-academic member of staff. Rather than the relaxed conditions I expected, I found myself in the most stressful environment I had ever experienced.I initially assumed this was isolated to my university. However with a little online research, I found these toxic conditions were commonplace in universities the world over. Having been part of the university system for some time, Im now able to see past the imposing architecture and impressive titles.These figures sit uncomfortably next to the professed ideals of these institutions. Our universities claim to exist to provide our most brilliant minds the freedom to nurture their greatest ideas and inspire the next generation.To facilitate this, the organisation provides infrastructure and services. With these resources, hundreds of academics are then free to pursue their goals and further their own positions as quasi-entrepreneurs. Unfortunately, these untethered conditions are also very favourable for those with an unhinged sense of entitlement. It strikes me that a rogue professor can often operate on campus with virtual impunity.Even a well-meaning academic has to juggle many responsibilities. For example, a research professor must teach hundreds of undergraduates, supervise a team of PhD researchers, manage research grants and collaborations and edit publications and dissertations. Very few professors are able to accomplish all this without the overwhelming burden affecting their character and judgement. The resulting stress often manifests as poor judgement and negative behaviour.Unfortunately, the ones most likely to be on the receiving end of this are the PhD students, postdoctoral researchers and non-academic staff, who are often on short employment contracts. These people are in very tenuous positions and have little if any recourse. This situation creates a dynamic where the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour are often blurred.There are also many academics who can only muddle through by riding on the coattails of students. Sadly, students are also vulnerable to the theft of data, ideas and materials; not only by their colleagues, but sometimes by their own supervisor. In a university environment, this type of bad behaviour is unfortunately so frequent, it is too often normalised and ignored.The surprising tolerance of this type of behaviour is likely a result of academia being a product of itself. After all, all academics were once long-suffering PhD students. Hence because of the familiarity, academia often fails to see the gravity of the situation.But the wider community would be shocked to know this behaviour was so prevalent at the very highest level of education. The community expects so much more from people calling themselves doctor or professor. The current model of postgraduate research is severely flawed and should be urgently addressed. If we dont, the vicious circle will continue.Q. The author of the passage is most likely to support which one of the following statements?

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.Badrinath College of Engineering (BCE) was established on 1st May 1993 on the 60th birth anniversary of Mr. Prakash Badrinath with 4, 5, 3 and 2 professors in Civil, Mechanical, Electrical and Information Technology department respectively. On 1st of June 1993 one more professor joined. On every 1st June of the subsequent years up to 1996 one professor is recruited for one of the departments with the salary of Rs. 15,000 per month. So, at the end of 4 years, 4 new professors were recruited across 4 departments. Professors who joined in May 1993 were placed in different pay scales based on their experience and qualifications, with the minimum of Rs. 15,000 per month and difference between any two pay scales is in multiples of Rs. 5,000. Each department has only one head of the department and he is paid more than the others. After completion of one year of service, each professor is given an annual increment of Rs. 3,000 effective from 1st June every year. During the period from 1st May 1993 to 31st May 1996 only one professor resigned across the four departments.The table given below shows the annual average monthly salary of the professors of BCE for each department as on 1st June every year. When did a new professor join the civil department?

Directions: Read the following passage and solve the questions based on it.a. Six Indian professors from six different institutions(Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Neptune, Pluto, Uranus) went to China to attend an international conference on "Sustainability and Innovation in Management: A Global Scenario" and they stayed in six successive rooms on the second floor of a hotel (201 - 206).b. Each of them has published papers in a number of journals and has donated to a number of institutions last year.c. The professor in room no. 202 has published in twice as many journals as the professor who donated to 8 institutions last year.d. The professor from Uranus and the Professor in room number 206 together published in a total of 40 journals.e. The professor from Jupiter published in 8 journals less than the professor from Pluto but donated to 10 more institutions last year.f. Four times the number of 4 journal publications by the professor in room number 204 is lesser than the number of institutions to which he donated last year.g. The professor in room number 203 published in 12 journals and donated to 8 institutions last year.h. The professor who published in 16 journals donated to 24 institutions last year.i. The professor in room number 205 published in 8 journals and donated to 2 institutions less than the professor from Mercury last year. The Mercury professor is staying in an odd numbered room.j. The Mars professor is staying two rooms ahead of Pluto professor who is staying two rooms ahead of the Mercury professor in ascending order of room numbers.k. The professors from Mercury and Jupiter do not stay in room number 206.Q. How many institutions did the Jupiter professor donate to last year?

Directions: Read the following passage and solve the questions based on it.a. Six Indian professors from six different institutions(Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Neptune, Pluto, Uranus) went to China to attend an international conference on "Sustainability and Innovation in Management: A Global Scenario" and they stayed in six successive rooms on the second floor of a hotel (201 - 206).b. Each of them has published papers in a number of journals and has donated to a number of institutions last year.c. The professor in room no. 202 has published in twice as many journals as the professor who donated to 8 institutions last year.d. The professor from Uranus and the Professor in room number 206 together published in a total of 40 journals.e. The professor from Jupiter published in 8 journals less than the professor from Pluto but donated to 10 more institutions last year.f. Four times the number of 4 journal publications by the professor in room number 204 is lesser than the number of institutions to which he donated last year.g. The professor in room number 203 published in 12 journals and donated to 8 institutions last year.h. The professor who published in 16 journals donated to 24 institutions last year.i. The professor in room number 205 published in 8 journals and donated to 2 institutions less than the professor from Mercury last year. The Mercury professor is staying in an odd numbered room.j. The Mars professor is staying two rooms ahead of Pluto professor who is staying two rooms ahead of the Mercury professor in ascending order of room numbers.k. The professors from Mercury and Jupiter do not stay in room number 206.Q. In which room is the Mars professor staying?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the information below and answer the question that follows.In the year 2000, university students devoted more time to research work per month than they did in 1999. Undergraduate students, however, spent less time per month on their research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.Q. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the information given above?a)Professors assigned more research work in 2000 than they did in 1999.b)Graduate students devote more time to their research work than undergraduate students.c)The amount of time devoted to research work by graduate students increased from 1999 to 2000.d)There were more university students in 2000 than there were in 1999.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup